Logo Countrypages2

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: October 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Open-uri20091008-26004-1mx5m1g-0

Tunisia

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 36.67 out of 100 58
Business Indicator Index 7.40 out of 12 65

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Tunisia achieves low overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 36.67 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. Tunisia has been a subscriber to the Special Data Dissemination Standard of the International Monetary Fund since 2001, but the IMF reports there is much room for improvement in making information available to the public. Similarly, Tunisia's overall practices for monetary policy were judged to be transparent but nonetheless in need of certain improvements. Tunisia has pledged to adopt and implement the Financial Action Task Force's money laundering recommendations as well as the international standards for auditing and accounting. In the area of financial supervision, Tunisia has established the legal and regulatory framework for effective banking supervision and has made considerable progress in establishing a sound securities market supervisory framework. However, there is no information available on its adherence to the International Association of Insurance Supervisors' revised Insurance Core Principles.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

CPSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

Tunisia has been a subscriber to the Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since 2001. The SDDS website discloses that Tunisia meets most coverage, periodicity, and timeliness specifications, and disseminates the requisite advance release calendars, which are regularly updated. Tunisia avails itself of timeliness and periodicity flexibility options for its employment and unemployment data, and takes a special timeliness flexibility option for its first-quarter national accounts data. It also posts summary methodologies for all of the required data categories, except for interest rate data. The IMF's 2006 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes found that Tunisia had much room for improvement in making information available to the public. While data are released simultaneously to all interested parties, dissemination is hindered by the lack of an internet presence for the Tunisian Ministry of Finance. The IMF's 2008 Article IV Consultation report notes that the ROSC's recommendation that Tunisia replace outmoded methodologies and categorization standards with systems currently recognized as international best practice is now well underway.

Read More

ENCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

In 2002, the IMF published its most recent full-scale assessment covering monetary policy transparency (updated in 2006), in which Tunisia's overall practices for monetary policy were judged to be transparent but nonetheless in need of certain improvements. Flaws identified in the report included a lack of clarity in the prioritization of policy objectives, insufficient autonomy of the Central Bank of Tunisia (Banque Centrale de Tunisie, BCT) due to the criteria by which bank board members were appointed or dismissed, the lack of an independent audit of the BCT's accounts, and the failure to make publicly available a periodic, performance-oriented assessment of monetary policy implementation. In the 2006 update, the IMF found that the production of a performance-oriented assessment was partially implemented, whereas the problems of BCT policy prioritization, board appointment/dismissal criteria, and independent auditing were pending legislation. In 2006 the BCT law was amended to enhance the central bank’s autonomy and independence. The 2007 IMF Article IV Consultation reported that a provision of the amendment specifically defined the BCT’s primary monetary policy objective as the maintenance of price stability. Tunisia has been a subscriber to the IMF's Special Data Dissemination Standard since 2001, and generally meets all requirements of data coverage, periodicity, and timeliness.

Read More

ENCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

Tunisian fiscal policy transparency has been the subject of a series of assessments and updates conducted by the IMF in 1999, 2001, and 2002. The issue was discussed to a lesser degree in the 2007 and 2008 IMF Article IV Consultation reports. These assessments found that Tunisia has made steady progress in achieving transparency in fiscal management, some of which resulted from Tunisia's subscription to the IMF's Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) in June 2001. A new tax code in 2002 provided greater clarity on taxpayer rights and government obligations. Tunisia's ongoing move toward greater fiscal consolidation and the privatization of state-owned enterprises has also helped to improve both transparency and sustainability. The SDDS website discloses that Tunisia meets all requirements of timeliness, coverage, and periodicity and produces advance release calendars for all relevant fiscal data. Nevertheless, the IMF maintains that Tunisia still must make additional reforms to meet all requirements of fiscal transparency. Not all of Tunisia’s budget data is made available to the public, and the data itself is not subject to a fully independent review. Furthermore, Tunisia has not entirely embraced the concept of publishing a medium-term budget framework. The 2008 Article IV Consultation lauds Tunisia’s fiscal discipline in recent years, but cautions that reforms are needed in entitlement programs in order to maintain long-term sustainability.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

IIEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

There is insufficient publicly available information that directly addresses Tunisia's compliance with the World Bank's Principles and Guidelines for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems. However, a 2004 study by P. A. Casero and A. Varoudakis attempted to quantify Tunisia's insolvency regime according to a number of measures. The authors concluded that creditor's rights in Tunisian bankruptcy proceedings are weak, business exit remains lengthy, and the courts reserve broad powers in insolvency proceedings. These broad court powers are found to work against the protection of creditor's rights, inasmuch as access to bankruptcy documents is restricted to the court and there is no meaningful creditor participation in the decision-making process because only the court can initiate a bankruptcy plan. While the structure of the courts and the content of insolvency related legislation has not changed over the years, the 2010 Doing Business report on Tunisia's performance in closing a business discloses that improvements have been made at least in terms of the time required to complete proceedings. In 2003, the year for which Casero and Varoudakis' data was derived, it took 2.5 years to close a business, whereas the 2010 report shows that the time has been nearly cut in half, averaging 1.3 years today. As for costs and recovery rates, however, little change has been noted over the years.

Read More

IDInternational Financial Reporting Standards

A 2009 Institute of Chartered Accountants (OECT) Action Plan (prepared as part of the International Federation of Accountants self-assessment program) explicitly states that International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) have not been adopted in Tunisia. However, the OECT promotes the adoption of IFRSs and the Tunisian Ministry of Finance has also been involved in analyzing the impact of applying IFRSs with the long-term goal of convergence with the international standards. Companies in Tunisia adhere to national accounting standards called the Tunisian Accounting Standards (TASs). The World Bank, in a 2004 assessment of accounting and auditing practices in Tunisia, observed that Tunisia's Law on the Enterprise Accounting System in 1997 changed TASs dramatically, achieving greater harmonization with IFRSs. However, significant differences persisted, because some of the TASs are based on an earlier version of IFRSs. Moreover, the World Bank pointed out that financial institutions and insurance companies demonstrated low compliance with TASs. It therefore recommended adopting IFRSs for all public interest entities while maintaining the use of TASs by Small and Medium-size Enterprises. The World Bank also recommended that Tunisia strengthen its legal framework and financial transparency requirements, as well as upgrade its academic and professional education and training in the field of accountancy.

Read More

IIPrinciples of Corporate Governance

Tunisia has been actively cooperating with international organizations to improve its corporate governance framework and practices and successive efforts have been made to upgrade the regulatory system. The 2000 Commercial Code constitutes the main reference regarding corporate governance. According to a 2002 Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) on Securities Regulation by the IMF, legislation in Tunisia regarding the provision of public information on listed companies and the protection of shareholders' rights was perceived as "sound and clear." In its 2006 FSSA Update, the IMF stated that the banking law was revised in 2006 and governance of banks is improving. A 2007 IMF report notes that a financial securities law was adopted to enhance transparency and reliability of accounting, and a 2008 report by Matoussi and Chakroun found that the extent of voluntary disclosure had increased over time. The Tunisian Code of Best Practice of Corporate Governance was launched in 2008 by the Arab Institute of Business Managers. Despite these developments pointing toward the establishment of a sound legal framework, several sources, including a Center for International Private Enterprise 2005 report, note that there is a clear gap between Tunisia's corporate governance legislation and its implementation. Furthermore, there is insufficient information publicly available directly addressing Tunisia's compliance with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's Principles of Corporate Governance.

Read More

IDInternational Standards on Auditing

In a 2004 World Bank assessment (updated in 2006), it was observed that Tunisia has two professional accountancy bodies that are authorized to conduct statutory audits. Originally, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Tunisia (OECT) had the exclusive right to conduct audits, but this right was later extended to another professional body, the Society of Accountants. Per the World Bank, the OECT adopted International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) way back in 1999, effective for periods beginning in 2000. The Society of Accountants, on the other hand, at the time of the assessment had not adopted ISAs and there is no recent information on their future strategy with respect to convergence. The World Bank, therefore, had recommended all statutory audits be conducted in accordance with ISAs. It also pointed out discrepancies in the legal and regulatory framework, stressed the necessity to resolve these discrepancies, and recommended upgrading academic and professional education and training. More recently, a 2009 OECT Action Plan (developed as part of the International Federation of Accountants self-assessment program) notes that to incorporate the subsequent changes made to ISAs, the OECT is now planning to adopt the most recent French translation of the ISAs as well as the other pronouncements of the IAASB, with limited modifications. Per the Action Plan, by December 2009, the OECT is expected to incorporate new and amended Clarified ISAs translated by a francophone IFAC associate or member body into a new set of national standards known as the Tunisian Auditing Standards (TASs).

Read More

IDAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

Tunisia is a founding member of the Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF), which is an associate member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Members of the MENAFATF signed a memorandum of understanding in 2004 where they pledged to adopt and implement the FATF's recommendations. Law 2003-75 was enacted in Tunisia on December 15, 2003, forming the core of the country’s anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) legal framework. This law also established a financial intelligence unit (FIU) within the Central Bank of Tunisia. The MENAFATF conducted a mutual evaluation on Tunisia’s AML/CFT regime against the FATF 40+9 recommendations and special recommendations. The MENAFATF findings were published in a 2008 report, which notes that Tunisia’s AML/CFT framework is generally in line with international standards. However weaknesses remain in the legal framework with regard to: (1) customer due diligence (CDD); (2) feedback mechanisms and statistics; (3) the coverage of designated non-financial businesses and professions; and (4) suspicious transaction reports (STRs). The report deems Tunisia at least “largely compliant” with all the FATF Core Recommendations, with the exception of the 2 recommendations on CDD and STRs. Overall, Tunisia was found to be either “compliant” or “largely compliant” with 22 recommendations and 4 special recommendations, with 1 recommendation being inapplicable in the Tunisian context. The FATF, in its 2008-2009 Annual Report, names Tunisia as one of the jurisdictions that have endorsed the FATF's 40+9 recommendations.

Read More

IDCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

As reported in the IMF's 2002 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Payment Systems in Tunisia, the national check clearing and settlement system was the country's systemically important payment system, handling more than 90 percent of payments in terms of value. The system, however, was not compliant with Core Principles for Systematically Important Payment Systems (CPSIPS) IV and V, developed by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems. The 2006 IMF Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) Update asserted that the (then) forthcoming real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system would meet international best practice requirements, including settlement finality, fully collateralized intraday central bank advances, and optimization procedures for queues. The Tunisian Central Bank's 2006 annual report stated that a RTGS system, called the Gross Amount System of Tunisia (SGMT), came into operation in November 2006. According to a presentation made by Ramzy Hamadeh at a World Bank conference on payment systems in April 2009, the RTGS system is the main system used for large-value funds transfers in Tunisia. A 2008 report by the Middle East & North Africa Financial Action Task Force comments that Tunisia has adopted modern payment systems and encourages the use of electronic cash. However, since the implementation of the SGMT, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Tunisia's compliance with the CPSIPS. Nor is there published information as to whether the national check clearing system still remains systemically important. Tunisia is a member country of the Arab Monetary Fund and participates in its Arab Payments and Securities Settlement Initiative, which aims to assess and strengthen payment systems to improve their safety, efficiency and integrity. Despite the lack of recent assessments, the country has shown intent to improve its payment system architecture to fit international best practices as evident from the IMF's 2006 FSSA Update.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

ENCore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

A detailed assessment of Tunisia's compliance with the Basel Core Principles (BCPs) was published by the IMF in 2007 as part of its Financial Sector Assessment Program Update. The detailed assessment concludes that Tunisia is compliant with 14 BCPs, largely compliant with seven, and materially non-compliant with six of the 30 BCPs (since BCP 1 is divided into 6 sub-principles). The remaining three BCPs were adjudged as not applicable to the Tunisian context, since Tunisian banks have little exposure abroad. The report also observed that the legal and regulatory framework in Tunisia is largely consistent with international rules. In its 2007 assessment, the IMF took into account Tunisia's 2006 amendments to the 2001 Law Relating to Loan Establishments and the 1958 Law on the Creation and Organization of the Central Bank of Tunisia (BCT), as well as the BCT's 2006 Circular on Internal Controls. The IMF's 2007 report added that improvements implemented by the Tunisian authorities include the regulation of licensing, tighter investment criteria, better information sharing, and the introduction of consolidated supervision. However, the report noted that weaknesses remain in the areas of credit and provisioning policy, consolidated supervision, remedial measures, and supervision of foreign banks.

Read More

ENObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

According to the IMF's 2002 Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA), the legal framework governing the financial markets had been modernized and its objectives followed the International Organization of Securities Commission's (IOSCO) principles. However, there was poor enforcement of laws and regulations, diminishing public confidence in the market's transparency and integrity. A 2006 IMF FSSA Update indicates that Tunisia has since implemented structural reforms in order to improve the transparency and accountability of the financial system, strengthen the regulatory framework, and encourage the creation of more market intermediaries. However, although many of the recommendations of the 2002 IMF FSSA have been implemented or partially implemented, there has not been much growth in the stock market or the number of listings. The IMF's 2007 Article IV Consultation with Tunisia reports that the government has adopted a strategy to strengthen the legal framework based on the recommendations of the 2002 FSSA and its 2006 Update. A number of economic development projects since 2001 under the aegis of the World Bank and with support from the EU and the African Development Bank have also sought with relative success to develop the capital markets in Tunisia, strengthen the regulatory framework, promote corporate governance and transparency, and increase market capitalization.

Read More

IIInsurance Core Principles

In its 2002 FSSA, in which insurance supervisory practices in Tunisia were benchmarked against Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) developed by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) in 2000, the IMF concluded that supervision of insurance companies in Tunisia was inadequate and that supervisory resources were insufficient. Weaknesses were identified in the areas of capital adequacy and solvency, corporate governance, reinsurance, internal controls, and prudential rules. Following the IMF's 2002 assessment, Tunisian authorities adopted prudential norms regarding solvency and minimum capital requirements in line with international best practices, as noted in the IMF's 2006 FSSA Update. In reforming its financial sector, modernizing the regulatory framework for insurance, and restructuring the state-owned insurance firms between 2001 and 2004, the government of Tunisia was supported by loans from the World Bank, the African Development Bank, and the European Union. According to the World Bank's 2006 Financial Sector Assessment (FSA), the legal and prudential framework in Tunisia was strengthened through amendments to the Insurance Code in 2002. Furthermore, the General Directorate of Insurance was replaced by the General Committee on Insurance (CGA) as Tunisia's insurance supervisory authority. While the CGA had increased its staff and sanctioning powers and improved the frequency of its on-site inspections, the World Bank FSA found its authority still weak. In this context, the Ministry of Finance website states that a 2008 law created the CGA as an independent entity. The available sources, however, do not directly address Tunisia's compliance with the new, more stringent ICPs issued by the IAIS in October 2003.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 7.4/12, Tunisia is below standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Tunisia has a market-based economy, in which numerous State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) operate in many sectors. The U.S. Department of State asserts that state control of the Tunisian economy has been relaxed, and that today the economy is "mostly liberalized." While Tunisia encourages foreign investment, it places restrictions on foreign investors in several sectors to protect domestic industry. Tunisia provides tax exemptions on profits and reinvested revenues to companies that produce at least 80 percent of their goods for export. Secured interests in property are protected. There are good intellectual property rights laws, but enforcement has not always been consistent with foreign commercial expectations. Corruption is manageable, as reflected in Tunisia’s ranking of 65 out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s 2009 Corruption Perceptions Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Tunisia ranks mostly in the 3rd quintile for the global indices that benchmark its political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below. It ranks in the 2nd quintile in the World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Index and the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index. Tunisia scores relatively well compared to other countries in the Middle East and North Africa region, but the Bertelsmann Transformation Index notes that the democratic transition has largely stalled and Freedom House describes it as “Not Free.” As measured by the UNDP, Tunisia ranks in the 3rd quintile of the Human Development Report, and is solidly in the category of "medium human development.” Although in the 2nd quintile in the Corruptions Perception Index, Freedom House states that corruption is rampant among some leading political figures.

Credit Ratings

BBB/Stable Fitch

Baa2/Stable Moody's

BBB/Stable Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 39.8 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 3,813 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 4% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 3.5% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 14.1% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 2.8 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 0.00 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 310 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton