Logo Countrypages4

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: September 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Stringio

Nigeria

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 11.67 out of 100 87
Business Indicator Index 6.40 out of 12 73

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Nigeria achieves very low overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 11.67 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. Nigeria suffers from the legacy of decades of misguided policies, corruption, the poor state of basic infrastructure, and weak institutions. Six out of twelve standards are at an "insufficient information" level, making a full assessment of the country’s observance of international standards difficult. In the areas of data dissemination and insurance supervision, Nigeria is non-compliant. On the other hand Nigeria has expressed its commitment to adopt international accounting and auditing standards, though compliance is said to be weak and enforcement mechanisms inadequate. In addition, the Financial Action Task Force in its 2008-2009 names Nigeria as one of the jurisdictions that have undertaken to implement the FATF's 40+9 recommendations.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

NCSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

Nigeria is not yet a subscriber to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS), but subscribes to the General Data Dissemination System (GDDS), which is less prescriptive and generally less demanding than the SDDS. Nigeria has benefited from several technical missions dedicated to improving its data collection and dissemination practices and progress has been made, including the enactment of new legislation and the creation of a new National Bureau of Statistics, to replace earlier organizations that had suffered serious declines over the years. Nigeria is committed to a variety of reforms and improvements, including the computerization of its data compilation and dissemination, capacity building, staff training, and other such activities. Nonetheless, the 2007 IMF Article IV Consultation report and the GDDS website both disclose that significant deficiencies remain. There is no information available as to Nigeria's future intentions to subscribe to the SDDS. There is little publicly available information documenting Nigeria's data dissemination regime or evaluating its overall compliance with best practices.

Read More

IICode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

According to all sources used for this report, Nigeria has been subject to decades of misguided policies, corruption, poor infrastructure, and weak institutions, which have had implications for its ability to comply with the Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy. The IMF has reported since 2005 that reforms have been in the works to address issues of capacity constraints and poor data management, and has noted that Nigeria needs focused technical assistance in these areas. In 2007, Nigeria enacted a new Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Act that conferred upon the central bank a greater degree of autonomy and set forth the CBN mandate. In addition, the CBN has implemented a new IT system aimed at facilitating its data gathering, and has made a great deal of monetary-related information available on its website. However, the IMF did note that the new IT system had the temporary and unanticipated effect of actually introducing discrepancies in monetary data, as the CBN failed to provide for the potential problems that accompany transitioning to a new system. While Nigeria has been working toward improving its monetary policy transparency regime, it remains unclear to what extent these initiatives will bring Nigeria into compliance with the IMF's Code of Transparency in Monetary Policy.

Read More

IICode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

The 2007 passage of the Fiscal Responsibility Act and the National Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (NEITI) have contributed significantly to improvements in Nigeria's fiscal policy transparency, according to two IMF reports released the same year. In particular, the introduction of an oil price-based rule, restricting the government's use of oil revenues to cover its fiscal obligations, was applauded as a major step forward. However, major problems associated with Nigeria's federal system and its historical problems with public-sector corruption still remain. The reliability of fiscal data suffers from the lack of coordination in reporting across Nigeria's three tiers (federal, state, and local) of government, and from corrupt practices that are only recently being addressed. The failure of the Nigerian government to publish key budget documents has earned it a 19 percent rating ("Scant or None") on the Open Budget Index assessment by Ralph Ndigwe, and the inadequacies of Nigeria's data compilation and analysis have made it ineligible for subscription to the IMF's Special Data Dissemination Standard, although Nigeria does participate in the less prescriptive General Data Dissemination System. Despite a hodgepodge of reports from the IMF and World Bank addressing different areas of Nigeria’s performance against best practice standards, there is no definitive publication that explicitly addresses its adherence to the IMF’s Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

IIEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

There is insufficient publicly available information as to Nigeria's compliance with the World Bank's Principles and Guidelines for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems. Nigerian law is based on the principles of British common law, as a result of its historical link with the United Kingdom during the colonial era. Chapter 20 of the Laws of Nigeria comprises the Bankruptcy Law, but this deals with individual bankruptcy and is rarely used. For commercial insolvency issues, provisions in the Nigerian Constitution (1999) and the Companies and Allied Matters Act (1990) address related issues. According to the INSOL International, the Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) is the professional organization dealing with insolvency issues. A 2004 article by A. Ona regarding the BRIPAN mandate reports that the organization has been working to expand awareness of insolvency issues. In a 2009 interview for The Guardian, the current BRIPAN President Seyi Akinwumi announced his organization’s intention to help in drafting legislation dealing with insolvency and bankruptcy, business restructuring, and related issues.

Read More

IDInternational Financial Reporting Standards

According to an assessment of the accounting and auditing environment in Nigeria conducted by the World Bank in 2004, although Nigerian Statements of Accounting Standards (SASs) are based on the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), differences exist. A January 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers report on IFRS adoption notes that (as of January 2009) all financial statements in Nigeria were required to be prepared in accordance with the Nigerian SASs and that the Nigerian standard setting body had not yet announced any IFRS adoption or convergence plans. However, a 2009 Institute of Chartered Accountant of Nigeria (ICAN) self-assessment states that the Nigerian accounting standards-setter is currently incorporating IFRSs into the Nigerian accounting standards. The exact date of convergence, the assessment notes, was to be announced at the World Standard Setters’ Conference which was held in London September 10-11, 2009. There is no further information with respect to Nigeria’s announcement at this conference. However, with regards to banks, in November 2009, the Central Bank of Nigeria governor Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi announced a definitive deadline of December 2010 to adopt IFRSs for application by banks. As for the regulation and enforcement of financial reporting requirements, the World Bank concluded that Nigeria needs to strengthen enforcement mechanisms to improve compliance. The World Bank also recommended establishing an independent oversight body responsible for the adoption and enforcement of accounting and auditing standards by public interest entities. Simplified reporting requirements for small and medium-sized enterprises should also be developed, the report noted.

Read More

IIPrinciples of Corporate Governance

According to the 2008 Doing Business Guide published by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Nigeria's legal, accounting, and regulatory framework is consistent with international norms, however, the implementation of laws is “uneven”. The two most relevant laws regarding corporate governance are the Companies and Allied Matters Act 1990, which defines the duties of the managers of limited liability companies, and the Investment and Securities Act (ISA), which charges the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with regulating and developing the capital market and preserving orderly conduct, transparency, and market confidence. The 2003 Code of Corporate Governance, issued by an SEC-appointed committee, is a voluntary code which includes best practices with regard to the roles and duties of the Board of Directors and Management, the role and duties of the Audit Committee and the rights of shareholders. The Code is implemented on a comply-or-explain basis; however, a 2008 presentation by SEC Deputy-General, Musa Al-Faki notes that in order to improve enforcement, the Commission made some of the provisions legally binding. For instance, per the presentation, certain sections of ISA 2007 contain provisions from the code. In addition, the SEC has also set up a committee to review the 2003 Code and this committee, at the time of the Al-Faki presentation, was in the process of making new recommendations. Despite the above information, there is no assessment directly addressing Nigeria's compliance with the principles of corporate governance developed by the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation.

Read More

IDInternational Standards on Auditing

According to a 2009 Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN) self-assessment, in May 2008, the ICAN adopted thirty International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) with modifications to reflect the local legal environment by issuing new and revised Nigerian Standards on Auditing (NSAs). The ICAN expressed its commitment to further its convergence by continuing to review and adopt new and amended ISAs, including clarified ISAs. Earlier in a 2004 accounting and auditing assessment conducted by the World Bank, the evaluators pointed out that Nigeria did not have any national auditing standards. At the time of the assessment, companies were recommended to use the ISAs and the ICAN advised its members that compliance with ISAs is optional. The World Bank found compliance to be weak and enforcement mechanisms inadequate outside of the banking sector. The World Bank recommended the creation of an independent oversight body responsible for the adoption and enforcement of accounting and auditing standards by public interest entities.

Read More

IDAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

In 2008, the Inter-Governmental Action Group Against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA) – which conducts Financial Action Task Force (FATF)-style self and mutual evaluations on the efficacy and progress of domestic measures of member countries – released the findings of the mutual evaluation they conducted on Nigeria's Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) regime against the FATF’s 40+9 recommendations. According to the findings of this report, Nigeria largely complies with 7, partially complies with 20 and does not comply with 20 FATF recommendations and special recommendations. Nigeria has been making efforts to strengthen its AML framework since it appeared on the list of non-cooperative countries and territories (NCCT) in 2001. As a consequence, Nigeria’s name was taken off the list in June 2006. Despite these efforts numerous flaws still persist. Most significantly, the 2008 GIABA mutual evaluation report notes that terrorism and terrorist financing have not been sufficiently criminalized under the legal framework. Furthermore, Nigerian authorities have not issued clear guidance to financial institutions resulting in weak customer due diligence (CDD), record keeping, and suspicious transaction reporting requirements. However, a bill on terrorism prevention is currently before the National Assembly. The GIABA mutual evaluation notes that the bill is comprehensive and has incorporated all the measures in UN Security Council Resolutions 1267 and 1373. A 2009 Update by GIABA on Nigeria's progress since the 2008 mutual evaluation concludes that Nigeria has made significant efforts to address the shortcomings observed by the assessors and that the Nigerian authorities are determined to address all other concerns raised by the 2008 mutual evaluation in order to build a robust AML/CFT regime in the country. Moreover, the FATF's 2008-2009 Annual Report names Nigeria as one of the jurisdictions that have undertaken to implement the FATF's 40+9 recommendations.

Read More

IDCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

In a 2006 report, the IMF notes that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) introduced a Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) system in November 2005 as part of its move toward electronic banking. The CBN website states that the country's RTGS system, the Central Bank of Nigeria Inter-bank Fund Transfer (CIFT), is expected to achieve secure interoperability with other payment and settlement systems in the country, thereby ensuring immediate payment settlement with intraday finality as well as delivery versus payment in all securities transactions. Further, the website reports that the CBN is the main regulator of payment systems. The Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation complements the oversight function of the CBN to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of payment systems. The CBN adds that all systems operate largely in accordance with the Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems (CPSIPS) and the Lumfalussy Standards. However there is no validation of this information from a third party source, and no further information is publicly available regarding Nigeria's compliance with the CPSIPS.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

IICore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), in its 2005 Banking Supervision Annual Report, mentions that an African zone-wide assessment undertaken by the FIRST Initiative found that Nigeria fully met 10 and largely satisfied 15 of the 25 Basel Core Principles (BCPs) for Effective Banking Supervision. However, the FIRST Initiative assessment is not publicly available. According to a 2008 IMF report, the consolidation and recapitalization of the banking sector and the ongoing reform have re-instilled confidence in the Nigerian financial system and enhanced banking system stability, soundness, and profitability. The CBN, per the IMF report, has also strengthened its regulatory framework by developing a risk-based and consolidated supervisory approach, and enhanced supervisory cooperation and information sharing arrangements. A key banking law, the Central Bank of Nigeria Act was amended in 2007, granting greater autonomy to the CBN. Moreover, the CBN has embarked on an ambitious financial sector reform program to remove inherent weaknesses and catapult Nigeria's economy into the top 20 worldwide by 2020. A medium-to-long-term financial sector strategy (called the FSS 2020) has been devised with technical assistance from the IMF and other international bodies to strengthen the domestic markets, integrate the domestic markets with the global financial markets, and create an International Financial Center in Nigeria. The regulatory framework is also being overhauled with plans to move to a single regulator, the Financial Services Commission. Apart from the information provided above, there is little information directly addressing Nigeria's compliance with the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision.

Read More

IIObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

The principal regulatory agency of the Nigerian capital market is the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Its powers are derived from the Investments and Securities Act, which was overhauled in 2007. Per a 2004 World Bank report, the SEC does not successfully fulfill its supervisory or enforcement roles. However, several reports on the Central Bank of Nigeria's website detail the country's efforts to remove inherent weaknesses in financial regulation through an ambitious financial sector reform program aimed at making Nigeria one of the top 20 economies by 2020. A medium-to-long-term financial sector strategy (called the FSS 2020) has been devised with technical assistance from the IMF and other international bodies to strengthen the domestic markets, integrate the domestic markets with the global financial markets, and create an International Financial Center in Nigeria. There are also plans to move to a single regulator, the Financial Services Commission. Apart from the information provided above, there is little information directly addressing Nigeria's compliance with international standards, including International Organization of Securities Commissions' Principles of Securities Regulation.

Read More

NCInsurance Core Principles

The objective of the Financial System Strategy 2020 (FSS 2020) initiative launched by the Nigerian government is to reform the financial system in Nigeria in order to make the country the financial hub of Africa by the year 2020. A number of documents prepared for the 2007 conference on the implementation of the FSS 2020 pointed out that the insurance sector is the "weakest link" in the Nigerian financial system. Inadequate supervision and regulation, a negative image of the insurance sector, low awareness of the public, poor financial reporting, and weak management and technology were identified as the major challenges facing the industry. Yemi Soladoye, in his presentation at the 2007 Financial System Strategy 2020 International Conference, outlined the main strategic objectives of the reforms in the insurance sector. The authorities plan to revise existing insurance laws in order to bring them in line with the "internationally recognized legal system" by 2010; introduce International Accounting Standards, best practices in corporate governance, and stringent solvency rules; and strengthen protection of policy holders, along with other measures. Further, there are plans to integrate financial sector regulation in a single regulator, the Financial Services Commission, and to implement Solvency II by 2010.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 6.40/12, Nigeria is progressing toward standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Nigeria has a market-based, statist economy, in which total government expenditure, including consumption and transfer payments, is moderate. Nigeria offers good investment opportunities and incentives in targeted areas and sectors. However, there are many barriers to investment, including poor infrastructure, complex taxes, vague property laws, unpredictable enforcement of regulations, corruption, and crime. While the law provides protection for property rights, including intellectual property rights, enforcement of the law is weak. Political instability caused by religious and ethnic rivalries is also a deterrent to investors. Corruption is extensive, as reflected in Nigeria’s ranking of 121st out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Nigeria is ranked from the 3rd to the 5th quintile of the global indices benchmarking political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below. Nigeria's average score in the Bertelsmann Transformation Index highlights its uneven progress in transitioning toward a market democracy. This is supported by the Freedom House Index rating of "partly free." The Heritage Foundation Index shows that, although inflation is high, market prices are not distorted through government subsidies, and the labor market is fairly elastic. However, financial development is hindered by regulatory excess. The most problematic factors for doing business include low access to financing and an inadequate infrastructure, as highlighted by the Global Competitiveness Index. Moreover, the country's low ranking in the Milken Institute Capital Access Index is mainly attributed to its macroeconomic and institutional environment, as well as to the relatively low level of foreign capital available to businesses. Particularly noteworthy is Nigeria's very high perceived level of corruption, evident both in its low score and relative ranking on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index.

Name Year Rank Score Quintile
Bertelsmann Transformation Status Index 2010 84/128 4.92/10 4
Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index 2010 106/179 56.8% 3
Economic Freedom of the World Index 2009 97/141 6.31/10 4
World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Index 2009 99/133 3.65/7 4
Milken Institute Capital Access Index 2009 77/122 3.79/10 4
World Bank Ease of Doing Business Index 2009 125/183 N/A 4
UNDP Human Development Index 2009 158/177 0.51/1 5
Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2009 130/180 2.5/12 4
Freedom House Index 2009 Partly Free 4.5/7

Credit Ratings

BB-/Stable Fitch

Not rated Moody's

B+/Stable Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 165.4 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 1,089 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 5.0% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 12.0% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 4.9% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 20.3 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 0.30 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 2,042 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton