Logo Countrypages5

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: December 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Stringio

Luxembourg

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 49.17 out of 100 39
Business Indicator Index 10.98 out of 12 12

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Luxembourg achieves medium overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 49.17 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. Luxembourg’s compliance in the areas of Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency is high but for fiscal policy transparency. As a Euro area member state, Luxembourg benefits from the highly transparent monetary policy framework of the European Central Bank, but there are no independent assessments of its fiscal transparency policy. Regarding the Institutional and Market Infrastructure environment, Luxembourg lacks comprehensive information on its corporate governance practices, but largely meets international requirements for its insolvency framework. Although the country has enacted laws, included European Commission directives, to align its practices with international standards, its accounting and auditing practices still present inconsistencies. Luxembourg was among the first wave of countries that migrated to the Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross Settlement Express Transfer (TARGET) 2 system in November 2007, which was found in 2009 by the European Central Bank to fully observe all relevant Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems. In the area of Financial Regulation and Supervision, Luxembourg shows a generally high level of compliance, but is marred by a lack of an independent assessment of the Grand Duchy's adherence to the revised Insurance Core Principles.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

CPSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

Luxembourg became a subscriber to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) on May 12, 2006 and met all SDDS requirement at the time of subscription. The IMF's SDDS website discloses that Luxembourg meets SDDS requirements for periodicity, coverage, and timeliness of data, although it does employ the timeliness flexibility option for national accounts and analytical accounts of the central bank. Luxembourg fulfills SDDS requirements for advance-release calendars and for the simultaneous release of data to all interested parties, where required. Information on the IMF's SDDS website also shows that Luxembourg meets most SDDS requirements for integrity of data. It does not, however, clearly state the means whereby confidentiality of individually identifiable information is achieved for a few data categories, and there is no clear identification of ministerial commentary or internal government access for exchange rates. With regard to the quality of data, the IMF's SDDS website indicates that Luxembourg does not provide the requisite information on component detail and cross-checks for certain data categories, specifically, general government (public sector operations), and interest rates. Summary methodologies are available for all datasets.

Read More

FCCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

Luxembourg adopted the euro with its launch in January 1999. Thus, its monetary policy is no longer governed by Luxembourg’s central bank (Banque Centrale du Luxembourg, or BCL). Rather, the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) determines Luxembourg’s monetary policy, and the Eurosystem (consisting of the ECB and the central banks of the member states that have adopted the euro) is responsible for its implementation. According to the IMF, the Eurosystem and the ECB maintain high transparency standards and a commitment to openness. The ECB observes the IMF's codes and standards for monetary policy transparency, and pursues an active policy of communication with the public. In 2009, the IMF voiced its support for the ECB’s accommodative monetary policy in response to the global financial crisis and recession in the European Union (EU). The Fund urged continued monetary easing in order to prevent a still-possible deflationary spiral, and called for quicker action from the EU in order to repair the financial system.

Read More

IICode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

According to both the 2008 Policy Brief by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the 2009 Article IV Consultations report by the IMF, Luxembourg lacks a medium-term focus for its fiscal policy, a shortcoming that has implications for policy effectiveness as well as transparency. In 2006, the IMF reported that Luxembourg saw no need to adopt a formal medium-term fiscal framework, because it felt that its participation in the European Union's Stability and Growth Pact provided enough of a medium-term framework to serve its budget management needs. The 2008 OECD report further suggested that Luxembourg needed to move away from its input-based, line-by-line approach to the budget process and to adopt a more outcome-oriented approach. Further, the OECD argued in an earlier (2006) report that Luxembourg needed to reduce its over-reliance on "special funds" for public investment projects, observing that such an approach could not respond to changing priorities over time. The 2008 OECD report states that, in the area of health insurance, there were plans to merge several of these funds, and suggests that this will lead to improvements in accountability and economies of scale. Nonetheless, there is insufficient information as to Luxembourg's overall compliance with IMF's Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

CPEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

A 2003 European Commission's Final Report of the Expert Group for the "Best Project on Restructuring, Bankruptcy and a Fresh Start" noted that Luxembourg has fully adopted 28 of the World Bank's Principles for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems, almost fully adopted 9 of them, and partially adopted the remaining 4. The foundational legislation underpinning Luxembourg's insolvency practices is the Commercial Code of 1807, which is buttressed by provisions of later, specific-purpose laws and amendments. PricewaterhouseCoopers reported in 2006 that Luxembourg has traditionally been perceived as debtor-friendly in matters of insolvency, but the legislation passed during last several years has attempted to shift the balance to accommodate a greater focus on creditor rights, as well.

Read More

NCInternational Financial Reporting Standards

In line with the European Commission Regulation No. 1606/2002, listed companies in Luxembourg are required to use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the EU in their consolidated accounts. Apart from the mandatory application of IFRSs, Luxembourg already permits IFRSs as a legal option for banks and insurance companies in their annual and consolidated accounts, according to a 2008 European Commission report. Other companies are permitted to use IFRSs albeit with the approval of the Ministry of Justice. Companies that choose not to apply IFRSs follow Luxembourg's Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) which, per a 2007 Deloitte publication, differ from the international standards. However, Luxembourg's legal environment is undergoing changes regarding accounting requirements. As explained in a 2009 Ernst & Young report, the national commercial law will be amended to introduce IFRSs into Luxembourg law as a legal alternative to the current local accounting principles. The Luxembourg authorities have developed a draft law (bill No. 5976) which will give all commercial companies registered in Luxembourg the option to use IFRSs both for annual and consolidated accounts. As of December 2009 there is no information on the conversion of Luxembourg’s GAAP with IFRSs.

Read More

IIPrinciples of Corporate Governance

Until 2006, the corporate governance framework in Luxembourg mainly consisted of the 1915 Law on Commercial Companies (as amended) and securities regulations. In April 2006, the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (LSEX) established the Ten Principles of Corporate Governance for listed companies, which entered into force on January 1, 2007. In 2009 these Principles were updated and a new version entered into force on October 1, 2009. These Principles are based on the comply-or-explain principle, and take into consideration the OECD's Principles of Corporate Governance. The LSEX is supervised by the authority responsible for the prudential supervision of credit institutions, the Commission for the Supervision of the Financial Sector (CSSF). On November 1, 2007, the Law on Markets of Financial Instruments was enacted to incorporate new provisions on transparency for shares and transaction reporting. The European Union Transparency Directive No. 2004/109/EC was also transposed into Luxembourg law on January 11, 2008 through the Law on Transparency Requirements, in which supervision of transparency requirements are transferred from the LSEX to the CSSF. However, there is insufficient information publicly available directly addressing Luxembourg's compliance with the OECD’s Principles of Corporate Governance.

Read More

IDInternational Standards on Auditing

According to a 2006 self-assessment prepared by the Institute of Companies' Auditors (IRE) as a part of the International Federation of Accountants' (IFAC) Member Body Compliance Program, audit of financial statements in Luxembourg is conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). The IRE adopted the pronouncements of the IAASB without any modifications and, as explained in the self-assessment, ISAs are supplemented with additional guidance for application in Luxembourg. However, the self-assessment noted that not only there was a timing difference between the IFAC’s and IRE’s effective dates, but also some of the amendments to the ISAs had not been adopted in Luxembourg, although the IRE was working on addressing these shortcomings. Luxembourg complies with the European Union Directive No. 2006/43/EC which requires all statutory audits of annual and consolidated accounts to be carried out in accordance with international auditing standards as adopted by the European Commission (EC). Although it is not specified which standards constitute international auditing standards, it is widely anticipated that ISAs, as issued by the IAASB, will be adopted. Per a 2009 EC publication, Luxembourg has fully transposed the above-mentioned Directive into its national legislation.

Read More

IDAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

In 2004, the IMF released an assessment on Luxembourg's compliance with the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) Recommendations on Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT). The IMF found Luxembourg to be broadly compliant with almost all of the FATF's recommendations. However, this assessment was based on the 2002 methodology for assessing compliance with the FATF recommendations. In 2004, the FATF released a revised methodology to assess compliance with its recommendations. Since then, there has been no comprehensive assessment publicly available as to Luxembourg's compliance with these requirements. However, a 2006 report by the IMF noted that Luxembourg continues to make progress in strengthening its AML/CFT framework. The main law criminalizing money laundering in Luxembourg was first enacted in 1989, and subsequently updated in 1998 and 2004. Following the 2004 IMF assessment, Luxembourg’s AML/CFT laws have undergone several changes. In 2008, an Act transposing the Third European Union Directive on Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (which requires all EU countries to implement the FATF’s recommendations) was passed, modifying Luxembourg's AML/CFT legal framework. The new law contains provisions regarding the scope of predicate offenses, customer due diligence, and internal risk management measures. Furthermore, the FATF, in its 2008-2009 Annual Report named Luxembourg as one of the jurisdictions that have endorsed the FATF's 40+9 recommendations. Luxembourg is also a member of the FATF.

Read More

FCCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

Luxembourg was among the first wave of countries that migrated to the Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross Settlement Express Transfer (TARGET) 2 in November 2007. Prior to joining to TARGET2, the two important payment systems in the country were the Luxembourg Inter-bank Payment System (LIPS-Gross) and the Luxembourg Inter-bank Payment System-Netting (LIPS-Net), both of which observed the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems' Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems (CPSIPS). LIPS-Gross was discontinued once Luxembourg joined TARGET2. LIPS-Net, on the other hand, was discontinued in 2006, and transactions settled through this system are now being processed on STEP2 (the pan-European platform operated by the Euro Banking Association. TARGET2 provides harmonized payment services under a single shared platform across its member countries. In May 2009, the European Central Bank (ECB) released an assessment of TARGET2's design against the CPSIPS. The report concludes that TARGET2 fully observes all relevant CPSIPS, although it does make certain recommendations pertaining to Principles III and VIII. It is generally believed that the system is an improvement over its predecessor, TARGET, and its component systems. The ECB in its function as the overseer of TARGET2 aims to ensure continued compliance of the system with the CPSIPS, and will regularly monitor the implementation of its recommendations by the system. The Organic Law of the Central Bank of Luxembourg (BCL) is somewhat vague in addressing its roles and responsibilities in the area of payment systems, although other laws do address these issues. Furthermore, the ECB asserts that the BCL follows the guidelines on payment systems set by the European System of Central Banks.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

CPCore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

The IMF undertook a Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) of Luxembourg and released its findings in its 2002 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes. According to the report, Luxembourg had a high level of compliance with all of the Basel Core Principles (BCPs) for effective banking supervision. However, the report did not specifically address Luxembourg's compliance with the individual BCPs. The report did note that the preconditions for effective banking supervision were in place, and that the supervisory framework of the Commission for the CSSF, which is responsible for the prudential supervision and regulation of credit institutions, was comprehensive. However, a subsequent IMF 2004 Article IV Consultation report identified weaknesses in the area of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism, and recommended remedial actions given that Luxembourg is one of the most important financial centers in the world. A subsequent (2009) Article IV Consultation report by the IMF also recommends strengthening the prudential framework and supervisory capacity, as well as enhancing on-site inspections. In response to the global financial crisis, the CSSF, in its 2008 annual report, considers broadening its prudential regulation to enable more direct intervention in the banks’ commercial policies and business models. The CSSF also advocates and strives towards strengthening and harmonizing the EU regulatory framework that Luxembourg is a part of.

Read More

CPObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

The IMF did not make any substantial recommendations in its 2002 Financial System Stability Assessment, in which securities regulation practices in Luxembourg were benchmarked against the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation. The IMF encouraged the supervisory authority, the CSSF, to develop an internal Code of Conduct. However, there is little further information publicly available as to whether Luxembourg authorities have established a Code of Conduct. The IMF report concluded that the basic conditions for the effective supervision of the securities markets and internal governance procedures were generally in place. Furthermore, the legal and accounting framework in Luxembourg was harmonized by European Union directives and was fully adequate to support the securities regulatory system. Per the same report, the CSSF, which acts as an independent agency responsible for the prudential supervision of credit institutions, had sufficient resources and powers to conduct an effective supervision and regulation of the securities market.

Read More

IIInsurance Core Principles

As a result of its favorable fiscal regime for insurance companies, Luxembourg has the potential to become one of the major European centers in the insurance sector, states a 2009 U.S. Department of Commerce’s Country Commercial Guide. In the IMF's 2002 Financial System Stability Assessment, insurance supervisory practices in Luxembourg were benchmarked against Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and Methodology developed by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) in 2000. The IMF concluded that Luxembourg had a high level of observance with all relevant ICPs. Furthermore, the report noted that the preconditions for effective insurance supervision were in place and mostly implemented in a satisfactory way. The Insurance Commission was established under the 1991 Law on Insurance Services as an independent supervisory body for the insurance sector. However, given the revision in October 2003 by the IAIS of the ICPs and Methodology, subsequent to the IMF assessment, there is insufficient information publicly available regarding Luxembourg's compliance with the new, more stringent principles.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 10.98/12, Luxembourg is at standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Luxembourg has a market-based economy, led by export intensives. The government oversees Europe's most generous welfare program while the highly specialized economy is run by the private sector. Both residents and non-residents are entitled to foreign exchange accounts, and there are no restrictions on capital transactions, current transfers, repatriation of profits, purchase of real estate, and access to foreign exchange. There is equal treatment for both foreign and domestic investors, but branches of banks outside Europe must be licensed and investments in industries related to national sector are restricted. Because the country imposes relatively low effective corporate tax rates as well as some of the lowest individual income tax rates, Luxembourg is considered to be a very attractive tax location for doing business. The country also adheres to key international agreements on intellectual property rights and protects intellectual property, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Luxembourg, regarded as one of the most politically stable country in the world, is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary form of government, where the head of the state is the Grand Duke and the head of the government is the Prime Minister. Corruption is of no concern in Luxembourg, since the country has effective corruption laws and regulations that are enforced equally on foreign and domestic investors.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Luxembourg is ranked in the 1st quintile in all the global indices benchmarking political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below. The exception is the World Bank's Doing Business Index, where its rank in the 2nd quintile reflects weak investor protection and shareholders' rights, and insufficient director liability. Luxembourg is a well-functioning market democracy with low corruption. However, while it ranks relatively high in the Economic Freedom Index, it scores below the world average in fiscal freedom, labor freedom, and government size, as the county avails itself of a generous welfare system. The Global Competitiveness Index highlights restrictive labor regulations and an inadequately educated workforce as the most problematic factors for doing business in Luxembourg.

Credit Ratings

AAA/Stable Fitch

Aaa/Stable Moody's

AAA/Stable Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 46.5 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 94,418 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): -0.2% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 0.2% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 4.5% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 3.0 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): -24.90 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): N/A million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): 376 million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton