Logo Countrypages1

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: March 2010
Jump to Another Country:
Open-uri20091008-26004-1o04epq-0

Kazakhstan

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 50.83 out of 100 35
Business Indicator Index 8.15 out of 12 56

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Kazakhstan achieves medium overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 50.83 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. Kazakhstan fares reasonably well in macroeconomic fundamentals, with good data quality and a high transparency of its monetary policy. Fiscal transparency, on the other hand, still needs reforms in many areas to meet the international standard but Kazakhstan's commitment to improve transparency and facilitate economic management, and especially to comply with the principles of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, is an important step forward. Observance of standards in the market infrastructure category represents a mixed picture. The Kazakh payment system compares well with core principles, and the framework for accounting and auditing meets international standards. Corporate governance, on the other hand, is a relatively new concept in Kazakh law but both the government and private sector acknowledge the need for improvement and development of corporate governance practices in the country. The country's compliance in anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) has been assessed as poor; however, some progress is being made in bringing the Kazakhstan’s AML/CFT regime in line with the international standards with the establishment of the financial intelligence unit and the adoption of an AML/CFT law. The FATF, in its 2008-2009 Annual Report, names Kazakhstan as one of the jurisdictions that have endorsed the FATF's 40 plus 9 recommendations. The country’s insolvency framework suffers from deficiencies in the bankruptcy and liquidation process and overall weak implementation. Finally, the Kazakh system of financial supervision has seen ambitious legal reforms and the creation of a new integrated financial supervisory authority in 2004, but the effective implementation of the initiatives has not yet been assessed.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

CPSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

Kazakhstan subscribed to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) on March 24, 2003 and started posting its metadata on the Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board (DSBB) on the same day. The SDDS website discloses that Kazakhstan meets SDDS requirements for periodicity, coverage, and timeliness of data, although it does avail itself of the timeliness and periodicity flexibility options for its central government operations data. Further, Kazakhstan fulfills, where applicable, relevant SDDS requirements for the access dimension. The SDDS website discloses that Kazakhstan could improve with regard to providing revisions information, as well as offering advance notice of major changes in methodologies. Confidentiality is protected by provisions in legislation, but there is no information as to such protections for fiscal sector datasets. Finally, the SDDS website discloses that Kazakhstan provides no information regarding the reconciliation of national accounts statistics with related data.

Read More

CPCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

An unpublished IMF Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) report for Kazakhstan was generated in 2000 and cited at length in a 2004 FSAP Update report. According to the 2004 report, Kazakhstan was found in 2000 to be “relatively transparent" in its conduct of monetary policies. The 2004 Update found that the National Bank of Kazakhstan (NBK) had achieved a high degree of transparency in the area of monetary policy because it had improved its communication strategy, thereby achieving greater openness regarding its policy targets through a greater outreach to the public and an improved website. Nonetheless, the report found that improvements were needed in the areas of governance, accounting, and internal audit. The 2008 IMF Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes data module for Kazakhstan discloses that the NBK's monetary data generally follows the standards and guidelines of the IMF's Monetary and Financial Statistics Manual.

Read More

IDCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

In 2003, the IMF published a Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes dealing with fiscal transparency in Kazakhstan. The IMF noted that the country had achieved substantial improvements in three critical areas: simplification of intergovernmental fiscal relations, establishment of a new treasury system, and achievement of basic accounting transparency. However, the Fund cautioned that maintaining these achievements over the long term would require institutional reform, including a strong emphasis on establishing auditing institutions that adhere to international standards and practices. It also urged greater transparency for the system of intergovernmental transfers. The IMF mission praised the Kazakh authorities on the availability of public information, stating that no further effort was required on this issue. In contrast, the 2008 Open Budget Index (OBI) found that Kazakhstan's budget system displayed only minimal openness, scoring it at 34 percent. In a 2007 report, the IMF noted that Kazakhstan was engaged in several initiatives that could improve transparency and facilitate economic management, specifically noting Kazakhstan's commitment to comply with the principles of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

NCEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

In 2003, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) found Kazakhstan to have achieved only "medium" overall compliance of its insolvency regime with prevailing international standards for effective insolvency and creditor rights systems, even though its insolvency laws were found to be among the strongest in Central Asia. Chief among the areas of deficiency are the reorganization and liquidation processes and the treatment of estate assets. Harmer and Cooper, writing for the EBRD in 2004, noted that the gap between the quality of Kazakh insolvency law and the effectiveness of its implementation was among the greatest to be found in the countries studied by the EBRD. Reforms took place through 2006 and were added to by regulations issued through the Ministry of Finance in 2007 and 2008. Nevertheless, the subsequent EBRD reports published in 2009 and 2010 disclose that the reforms of the insolvency regime had not brought about the expected changes and the overall rating of Kazakhstan in terms of its insolvency regime was downgraded to “low” compliance.

Read More

ENInternational Financial Reporting Standards

The Kazakh accounting framework is primarily governed by the provisions of the Law on Accounting and Financial Reporting of 1995, which was significantly amended in 2007, according to a 2007 World Bank assessment of the accounting and auditing environment in Kazakhstan. The amendments enacted in February 2007 mandate the application of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) by listed companies, large companies, and companies that qualify as public interest entities (PIEs). Small and medium-sized entities (SMEs) and companies that cannot be defined as PIEs may apply either IFRSs or the Kazakh Accounting Standards (KASs). The report explained that KASs, although said to be based on IFRSs, differ significantly from their international equivalents. Differences arise largely from the fact that KASs were developed in 1995, and, therefore, do not take into account any subsequent revisions made to the international standards. Thus, certain areas covered by IFRSs are not addressed by an equivalent KAS. Additionally, the assessment identified differences in disclosure requirements and accounting policies under the two frameworks. For entities that do not qualify as PIEs, the World Bank recommended setting up a committee to develop a simplified financial reporting system. This simplified reporting system may be based on the existing KASs subject to their revision or on the IFRS for SMEs developed by the IASB. As of February 2010, there is no information as to the developments in this area.

Read More

IDPrinciples of Corporate Governance

According to the 2007 Corporate Governance Sector Assessment by the EBRD, corporate governance is a relatively new concept in Kazakh law. Nevertheless, the assessment states that both the government and private sector acknowledge the need for corporate governance practices in Kazakhstan to be further developed and improved. The 2007 assessment, per a 2010 EBRD report, found corporate governance legislation in Kazakhstan to be in "medium compliance" with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD) Principles of Corporate Governance. The 2010 report states that weaknesses were identified with regard to ensuring the basis for an effective corporate governance framework, as well as disclosure and transparency. This represents a downgrade from the 2004 assessment by the EBRD which assigned Kazakhstan “high compliance.” The Law on Joint Stock Companies (JSCs) was introduced in 2003 and subsequently amended in 2005, as a 2006 EBRD report noted. The report observed that these amendments enhanced the system of state regulation of JSC activity and the protection of shareholders' and investors' rights. According to the 2007 EBRD assessment, the Council of Issuers approved the Kazakh Corporate Governance Code on February 21, 2005 and states that the Code is generally based on the OECD Corporate Governance Principles and the Recommendations on Application of Corporate Governance by Kazakhstan Joint Stock Companies.

Read More

ENInternational Standards on Auditing

According to the 2007 World Bank assessment of accounting and auditing practices in Kazakhstan, since 2006 the Law on Auditing mandates the use of International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and translated into Russian and Kazakh in accordance with the standard-setter’s translation policy. The previous edition of the Law mandated application of the Kazakh Standards on Auditing which differed significantly from ISAs. Although the law introduced significant changes in the auditing framework, the World Bank observed that compliance with the Auditing Law turned out to be challenging, because local professionals were not familiar with ISAs. Furthermore, the World Bank made a number of recommendations to the Kazakh authorities, including the requirement for an audit regardless of the entity's legal form only when there is a public interest for such an audit. The assessment also recommended making audited financial statements available to the public, establishing in the long term a public oversight mechanism for the audit profession, and developing a standard audit methodology and audit manual for ISAs. In its 2008 Action Plan, the Kazakh Chamber of Auditors (CoA) noted that it will continue to implement the IAASB pronouncements and was in the process of translating the IAASB’s 2008 Handbook. As of February 2010, the 2008 IAASB Handbook has been translated and is posted on the CoA website. No information as to the translation of the most recent version (2009) of the Handbook that contains Clarified ISAs is available as at the time of the writing of this report.

Read More

IDAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

The most recent assessment of Kazakhstan's compliance with the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) recommendations and special recommendations on anti-money laundering (AML) and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) was conducted in 2004 by the IMF. The results of this assessment was published in two separate reports by the IMF, namely, the Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) Update and the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) Update in 2004. The 2004 FSSA Update noted that the Kazakh AML legal framework was not in line with international standards, terrorist financing had not been criminalized as a separate offense, and there was no functioning Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). These findings were also confirmed by the U.S. Department of State in its 2005 report. However, the IMF assessment was conducted on the basis of the FATF's 2002 methodology, which was subsequently revised in 2004 and there is insufficient information publicly available regarding Kazakhstan's compliance with the FATF recommendations per its 2004 methodology. Nevertheless, the Eurasian Group (EAG) website as of January 2010 reports that some progress has since been made in Kazakhstan’s AML/CFT regime. In April 2008, the Financial Monitoring Committee, Kazakhstan’s FIU, was established within the Ministry of Finance. Kazakhstan also adopted the AML/CFT law in September 2009; due to come into effect on March 9, 2010. The EAG also reports that Kazakhstan’s next mutual evaluation is scheduled for July 2010. The FATF, in its 2008-2009 Annual Report, names Kazakhstan as one of the jurisdictions that have endorsed the FATF's 40 plus 9 recommendations.

Read More

CPCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

In 2000, the IMF assessed Kazakhstan's compliance with the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems' (CPSS) Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems (SIPS). At the time, the IMF identified two SIPSs: the Interbank System of Money Transfers (ISMT) and System of Retail Payments. In 2004, the IMF conducted a Financial System Stability Assessment Update of its 2000 assessment and concluded that only the ISMT is of systemic importance. The retail payment system, the Interbank Clearing System (ICS), is mentioned on the National Bank of Kazakhstan's (NBK) website and in recent published reports as being one of the payment systems operating in the country. However, there is no indication as to whether the system has since the 2004 IMF report been classified as a SIPS. The IMF's 2004 Update notes that the ISMT observes all Core Principles (CP) with the exception of CP I. With regards to CP I, the assessment finds inconsistencies between the Law on Payments and Money Transfers and the bankruptcy law concerning real-time finality or irrevocability of payments. However, the Kazakhstani authorities note that they do not consider the law to hinder any aspect of irrevocability. The 2004 IMF Update nonetheless recommends that a clause be inserted into the bankruptcy law to strengthen the irrevocability of payments. According to the NBK's 2008 Annual Report, the bulk of non-cash transactions, 98.4 percent, were processed through the ISMT system in 2008. Information provided on its website indicates that the NBK oversees the payment systems in the country, namely, the ISMT, and the ICS.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

ENCore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

On January 1, 2004, the Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Regulation and Supervision of Financial Markets and Financial Organizations (FSA) became the single supervisory and regulatory authority for the financial market, including the banking sector, taking on many of the responsibilities of the National Bank of Kazakhstan (NBK). Nevertheless, the NBK and the FSA still share responsibilities in licensing and the establishment of accounting standards. The IMF in 2000 conducted a FSAP of Kazakhstan's observance of the Basel Core Principles (BCPs) for Effective Banking Supervision, and in 2004 published an update of the FSAP. The 2004 FSAP Update concluded that Kazakhstan was compliant or largely compliant with almost three quarters of the BCPs, and had upgraded principles that had been rated as non-compliant in 2000. A more recent (2009) report, the Financial Sector Assessment by the World Bank notes that progress in implementing the 2004 FSAP Update recommendations has been somewhat mixed. Another recent report by the IMF, the 2009 Article IV consultation, indicates that the FSA has implemented some of the recommendations, but still needs to strengthen its supervisory responsibilities. A 2008 annual report by the FSA mentions the results of a self-assessment on the country’s compliance with the revised version (2006) of the BCPs. The self-assessment concludes that Kazakhstan meets 24 of the 25 BCPs (2006). The self-assessment itself has not been published and there is no recent third party assessment corroborating the findings mentioned in the FSA's 2008 annual report.

Read More

ENObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

The IMF in 2000 conducted a FSAP of Kazakhstan's compliance with the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation, and in 2004 published an update of the FSAP. The (unpublished) 2000 FSAP (as cited in the 2004 Update) concluded that, while the core legal infrastructure of the securities market was in place, the regulatory framework remained weak. However, as the 2004 Update observed, Kazakhstan had substantially improved its legal framework for securities regulation since 2000 by enacting the Law on the Securities Market and the Law on Joint Stock Companies in 2003. Effective January 1, 2004, the FSA became the supervisory and regulatory authority for the securities market, replacing the National Securities Commission. The IMF's 2004 FSAP Update noted that the new laws provide the FSA with a clear and consistent regulatory framework. The EBRD conducted detailed assessments of securities market legislation in Kazakhstan in 2004 and 2007 and both assessments concluded that the regulatory framework was in “medium compliance” with the IOSCO Principles. The 2007 assessment adds that Kazakhstan has met most of the legal requirements of the IOSCO Principles, showing only minor shortcomings. As the 2010 EBRD report reveals, shortcomings related to the areas of clearing and settlement, financial instruments, and money laundering. Weaknesses were also found in the FSA’s sanctioning and oversight powers. The 2008 annual report of the FSA contains results of a self-assessment of the country’s compliance with the IOSCO Principles, which concludes that Kazakhstan fully observes 11 principles, largely observes 16 principles, and materially does not observe one principle relating to asset valuation and pricing of units of collective investment schemes. Two principles relating to self-regulatory organizations are not applicable since these entities do not exist in Kazakhstan.

Read More

IDInsurance Core Principles

In a FSAP conducted in 2000, the IMF assessed Kazakhstan’s observance of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Principles in effect in 2000. The FSAP was not published but finds detailed mention in an Update for that FSAP conducted by the IMF in 2004. The main recommendations of the 2000 FSAP were for Kazakhstan to adopt a new insurance legislation consistent with international best practices, upgrade supervision to meet the requirements of the new legislation, strengthen implementation and enforcement practices, and develop an actuarial profession. According to the IMF's 2004 FSAP Update, the Kazakhstani authorities had made good progress in updating insurance legislation. The 2004 FSAP Update also found that the Insurance Law, (which has since been amended on several occasions), complied with international best practices and gave sufficient powers to the FSA to regulate the insurance industry. However, the 2004 IMF report raised questions on the FSA’s enforcement capacity to fully meet the legislative requirements, due particularly to a shortage of staff and resources. The Update did not rate the individual principles since the IAIS had promulgated revised, more stringent Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) in 2003. Nonetheless, as noted in the FSA’s 2008 annual report, the FSA conducted a self-assessment on Kazakhstan’s compliance with the 2003 ICPs, and concluded that Kazakhstan fully observes 17 ICPs; largely observes 8 IAIS principles; partly observes 2 principles relating to group-wide supervision and fraud; and does not observe one principle (Principle 28 on money-laundering). Further, as the annual report asserts, the FSA has made significant progress in insurance legislation since the IMF’s 2004 FSAP update in order achieve compliance with the ICPs. A 2010 report by the EBRD also attests that the insurance regulatory framework in Kazakhstan “almost meets” the IAIS standards, although it does point out the weakness in the operational independence and enforcement capacity of the FSA.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 8.15/12, Kazakhstan is progressing toward standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Kazakhstan’s economy is considered to be one of the most successful cases of transition in the post-Soviet region, although it is authoritarian in nature. Capital transfers are still subject to some restrictions. The country also formally encourages foreign investment and offers equal rights to foreign and domestic investors, but there are ownership requirements in the media and telecommunications sectors, and the foreign investment screening process represents a serious obstacle as it is long, arbitrary, and lacks transparency. Property rights and contract laws are established, but enforcement is underdeveloped and can be somewhat arbitrary. This is partially due to the problem of corruption, which is perceived as being extensive, reflected in Kazakhstan’s poor standing in Transparency International’s 2009 Corruption Perceptions Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Kazakhstan ranks in the 2nd or 3rd quintile for the majority of the global indices that benchmark its political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below. However, its status of “Not Free” in the Freedom House Index reflects that Kazakhstan continues to be an authoritarian rather than a democratic regime. Moreover, perceived corruption is an area of particular weakness. Kazakhstan is in the 4th quintile of the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index, placing it below 119 other countries. The Heritage Foundation Index of Economic Freedom cites foreign investment and property rights as areas with particular weaknesses. While receiving an average score in the World Bank Doing Business Index, it receives an exceptionally poor score in the subcategory "trading across borders," which measures the costs and procedures involved in importing and exporting goods.

Credit Ratings

BBB-/Negative Fitch

Baa2/Negative Moody's

BBB-/Stable Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 101.9 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 6542 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 2% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 6.6% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 6.6% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 14.5 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 3.80 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 202 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton