Logo Countrypages5

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: May 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Stringio

Ireland

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 58.33 out of 100 17
Business Indicator Index 10.98 out of 12 12

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Ireland achieves medium overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 58.33 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. As a Euro-member country, Ireland's compliance in the areas of macroeconomic fundamentals and financial supervision is high. The exception is insurance supervision, where Ireland's compliance with the revised international standards has not yet been assessed. Ireland also achieves high levels of compliance in the areas of insolvency framework and payment systems, but lags relatively behind in the areas of corporate governance, accounting, and auditing. However, even here, steps are being taken to achieve greater convergence and compliance. Ireland's anti-money laundering legal framework meets high standards, but suffers from weaknesses in oversight and enforcement.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

FCSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

Ireland has been a subscriber to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) since July 26 1996, and the SDDS website discloses that Ireland meets all requirements for coverage, timeliness, and periodicity, although it does avail itself of the flexibility option for timeliness in reporting labor market (wages and earnings) and central government debt data. Ireland provides summary methodologies and posts advance-release dates for all datasets reported to the IMF. The IMF's 2007 Article IV Consultation report deems Ireland's data provision to be adequate for surveillance purposes. The Irish Central Statistics Office's (CSO) 2008-2010 Strategy Guide, available on the CSO website, discloses that the Office is actively working to further improve its performance in both data compilation and dissemination, particularly through enhancements in its use of information technology.

Read More

FCCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

Ireland is one of the original euro-zone members. Therefore, since 1999, its monetary policy has no longer been governed by the Central Bank of Ireland, but instead by the European Central Bank's (ECB) Governing Council. Thus, Ireland does not have direct responsibility for the handling of monetary policy, and its compliance with this standard is equivalent to the compliance rating accorded to the Euro-system as a whole. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Euro-system is highly transparent, is strongly committed to openness, and is highly observant of the Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy. The IMF finds that the ECB is also committed to an active public communications policy. However, one area where transparency is at least partially compromised is in the inconsistency of disclosure practices across the individual national central banks of euro-zone member states.

Read More

IICode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

As a member of the European Union, Ireland is required to participate in the Stability and Growth Pact and is thus subject to intense budget scrutiny. In 2004, the Economic and Financial Committee (EFC) of the EU conducted an assessment of Ireland's compliance with European Monetary Union standards and found some problem areas. In particular, the EFC cited coverage gaps in both the national accounts and quarterly public finance data. However, a 2007 European Commission (EC) report found that Ireland's Stability Program was broadly compliant in both structure and in the provision of data. The EC report noted that improvements incorporated into the 2007 and 2008 budgets added greater detail that improved transparency and enhanced the ability to monitor public expenditure and budget performance. In sum, however, the publicly available information does not allow assigning Ireland a level of compliance with the IMF's Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

CPEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

As of 2002, according to the European Commission's (EC) "Best Project on Restructuring, Bankruptcy and a Fresh Start: Final Report of the Expert Group," Ireland has fully adopted seven of the Principles and Guidelines for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems developed by the World Bank. It has almost fully adopted 24 principles, and it has partially adopted ten principles. The underlying legislative framework for insolvency in Ireland is, primarily, the 1963 Companies Act with subsequent amendments, which the U.S. Department of Commerce's 2008 "Country Commercial Guide" for Ireland says are applied consistently by the Irish Courts. Ireland is among the top ten of the 181 countries that are evaluated by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank for the ease of closing a business and providing a high return to creditors as well as a relatively swift and low-cost business-closing process.

Read More

IDInternational Financial Reporting Standards

In line with European Commission (EC) Regulation No. 1606/2002, listed companies in Ireland are required to use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) in their consolidated accounts. The 2008 EC report on the implementation of this regulation points out that Ireland permits IFRSs in the annual accounts for listed companies and annual and consolidated accounts for all other companies, except for companies "not trading for gain." Companies which choose not to apply IFRSs are required to use accounting standards issued by the United Kingdom Accounting Standards Board (ASB) and its Urgent Issues Task Force, as promulgated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland. According to a number of publications on the subject, UK standards differ from IFRSs. However, in March 2004, the ASB released its "Discussion Paper: UK Accounting Standards - A Strategy for Convergence with IFRS," in which it announced that it intends to bring national accounting standards in line with IFRSs so as to avoid the use of two different sets of accounting rules in the UK. After extensive public consultations with stakeholders, as explained by David Loweth of the ASB in his presentation at the Accountants' Forum 2008, the ASB gradually moved from the initial "phased approach" to convergence to a "big bang" model, which implies mandatory adoption of IFRS-based UK standards at a specified future date. As of 2009, some UK FRSs are already based on the corresponding international standards. The ASB's intent is to incorporate amendments to the existing IFRS-based UK standards concurrently with the International Accounting Standards Board. In line with this strategy, in 2008 the ASB issued improvements to UK FRSs, in order to incorporate the International Accounting Standards Board's Improvement Project. In sum, as indicated in the 2008-09 Financial Reporting Council Annual Report, the ASB remains committed to convergence; however, the strategy for achieving it remains under consideration.

Read More

ENPrinciples of Corporate Governance

In an April 2009 issue of Accountancy magazine published by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland, Cian Blackwell points out certain shortcomings in the Irish corporate governance regime that have been exposed by the financial crisis. For instance, Blackwell notes that Irish legislation offers little with regard to good corporate governance at the board level. Ireland's corporate governance practices have been closely aligned with the United Kingdom's. The legal framework is primarily governed by the Companies Law which is adopted from the United Kingdom. Also, Ireland and the UK share the Combined Code issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) which is implemented on a comply-or-explain basis. In March 2009, the FRC initiated another review of the Combined Code to further update and strengthen its recommendations in light of recent developments. Overall, the Irish legal framework for corporate governance is considered robust. However, Blackwell expresses concerns about the low level of compliance with the Code. In a comprehensive review of Irish companies performed by Grant Thorton, fifty percent of Irish companies were found to be non-compliant with the Code. The author argues that while maintaining the principles-based approach, Ireland requires legislative backing for better enforcement of the Combined Code. The 2006 International Monetary Fund Financial System Stability Assessment Update also recommended that Ireland further improve its adherence to best practices in market conduct in order to enhance corporate governance.

Read More

IDInternational Standards on Auditing

The regulations of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland require auditors to follow auditing standards issued by the United Kingdom Auditing Practices Board (APB). In December 2004, the APB - the auditing standard-setter in the United Kingdom and Ireland - issued International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) (UK and Ireland) effective for periods commencing on or after December 15, 2004. According to the APB, these national standards are based on ISAs as then issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). Since 2004, however, the IAASB has revised some of the ISAs. In addition, in 2005 the IAASB, in order to improve the clarity of the international standards, introduced the 'Clarity Project' which entailed revising or redrafting existing ISAs. The Project was finalized at the end of 2008. In October 2008, the APB published a consultation paper seeking stakeholders' opinions on whether to adopt the revised and clarified ISAs. After extensive consultations, the APB in a March 2009 Press Notice announced its intention to update its auditing standards to incorporate the changes introduced by the Clarity Project. As a consequence, the APB issued for public comment exposure drafts of 33 Clarified ISAs (UK and Ireland) with the period for comment ending on July 22, 2009. When finalized, the new standards will replace the existing ISAs (UK and Ireland) and International Standards on Quality Control (UK and Ireland) 1 with effect for audits of financial statements for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. One of the areas where the APB believes further improvements in international standards are needed is ISA 700 on audit report, the clarified version of which is not expected to be adopted in the UK.

Read More

ENAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), in a 2006 report, summarizes the findings of its 2006 Mutual Evaluation on Ireland's Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) regime. In this report the FATF notes that the Irish legal structure and international cooperation framework meet high standards. The report, however, observes that statistics regarding AML/CFT investigations, prosecutions, and convictions are not comprehensive and, therefore, the actual implementation of Ireland's AML/CFT laws and regulations could not be properly evaluated. Nonetheless, some of the weaknesses pointed out include lax customer due diligence requirements, poor oversight of the non-profit sector, and the fact that a full range of designated non-financial business and professions are not covered by the scope of the AML/CFT laws. More recently, a 2009 U.S. Department of State (DoS) reports adds that as of November 2008, the European Commission had referred Ireland to the European Court of Justice for not implementing the Third EU Money Laundering Directive. However, the report points out that the Government of Ireland is likely to implement new legislation to address current weaknesses in customer due diligence, the identification of beneficial owners, politically exposed persons, and the designation of trusts. In its 2006 report, the FATF also indicates that Ireland's terrorist financing legislation is not comprehensive. The Irish Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) lacks resources to carry out its responsibilities, as also a full range of sanctioning powers. Some of these shortcomings still persist and the 2009 U.S. DoS report notes that Irish authorities should increase the technical and human resources provided to the FIU to manage and evaluate suspicious transaction reports effectively. Furthermore, legislation needs to be tightened with regard to terrorist financing and Ireland must fully implement UNSCR 1373. The Government of Ireland also needs to ratify the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the UN Convention against Corruption, the U.S. DoS report adds.

Read More

FCCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

An assessment by the European Central Bank (ECB) in 2004 found Ireland's systemically important payment system, the Irish Real-time Interbank Settlement (IRIS), to be largely compliant with the Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems (CPSIPS) developed by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems. The IRIS fully observed seven of the ten Core Principles (CPs), broadly observed two, and CP V was not applicable, given that IRIS was a Real Time Gross Settlement system. IRIS was a participant in the Euro area's Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross Settlement Express Transfer (TARGET) system. TARGET was replaced by TARGET2 in November 2007. The migration of TARGET member countries took place in four phases. Ireland was part of the second group of countries that migrated to TARGET2 on February 18, 2008. While with TARGET, the large value interbank payment systems of member countries were interlinked, TARGET2 provides harmonized payment services under a single shared platform across its member countries. In May 2009, the ECB came out with an assessment of TARGET2's design against the CPSIPS. The report concludes that TARGET2 fully observes all relevant CPSIPS, although it does make certain recommendations pertaining to Principles III and VIII. It is generally believed that the system is an improvement over its predecessor and its component systems. TARGET2 oversight function intends to ensure continued compliance of the system with the CPSIPS, and will continually monitor the implementation of its recommendations by the system.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

ENCore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

In 2001, Ireland was adjudged compliant with all Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Subsequently, in 2003, the banking sector supervisor changed from the Central Bank of Ireland to the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority (IFSRA), a distinct legal entity within the Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland (CBFSAI). However, a 2006 Update to the 2001 IMF assessment noted that the impact of this change in the regulator was insignificant to the overall banking supervisory process, because the IFSRA--now called the Financial Regulator--was functionally similar to its predecessor. In fact, the 2006 IMF Update noted that the new regulator had strengthened banking supervision in several areas. Despite positive measures by the regulator, recent events have exposed underlying weaknesses in the Irish banking system. According to several reports, the banking crisis that has unfolded in Ireland in 2008-09 is a consequence of various weaknesses in risk management, corporate governance and internal control, internal and external audit, financial reporting, and ethical behavior at the firm level, as well as the level of scrutiny and supervisory alertness of the Financial Regulator. In a 2009 report, the IMF is highly critical of Ireland's faulty and risky macro-economic, fiscal and financial policies, which together have landed the country in a huge financial crisis and economic downturn. Considering these facts a full compliance rating cannot be justifiably maintained. Furthermore, the previous rating assigned to the country was based on a 2001 IMF assessment which is due for an update. To counter the crisis and prevent another, the Irish authorities have recently unveiled plans to overhaul financial supervision in the country by, chiefly, scrapping the Financial Regulator and vesting its bank supervisory authority in the Central Bank.

Read More

CPObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

The Irish securities regulation framework was first comprehensively assessed in a 2001 report by the International Monetary Fund. In the report the IMF concluded that Ireland broadly observed all Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation issued by the International Organization of Securities Commissions, although some areas for improvement were noted. The 2006 Update to that report attested to Ireland's good progress in strengthening the securities regulatory and supervisory environment in accordance with the 2001 recommendations. In particular, Ireland moved to a consolidated financial sector supervisory framework in 2003 by creating the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority (IFSRA, now called the Financial Regulator). However, the 2006 IMF report still mentioned a few areas that could use further improvement, which Ireland was working on, according to a 2007 IMF report. The Financial Regulator also states on its website that its regulatory framework is based on EU laws and that it has implemented all relevant financial sector EU directives, including the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. In 2007, it also adopted a risk-based supervisory approach, dedicating staff resources to high-risk areas, making inspections more targeted and themed, developing a securities transaction reporting system, and formulating a prospectus review model, per its annual report of the same year. The Consumer Protection Code also became effective in 2007. Moreover, with the advent of the financial crisis in 2008-09, Ireland, along with other EU counterparts, is developing an action plan that constitutes enhancing financial stability arrangements and expediting the supervisory response to the crisis. In June 2009, the government of Ireland unveiled plans to scrap the Financial Regulator and transfer its supervisory functions to the Central Bank of Ireland in response to the domestic banking crisis, which has exposed serious supervisory weaknesses and corporate governance gaps.

Read More

IIInsurance Core Principles

In a 2001 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), which uses the 1997 International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Insurance Supervisory Principles (ISPs) as a benchmark for assessing insurance supervision in Ireland, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded that overall Ireland was in "substantial compliance" with the ISPs, although a number of shortcomings were identified. According to a 2006 IMF Financial System Stability Assessment Update, insurance regulation in Ireland had significantly improved since the original 2001 IMF ROSC. Ireland has consolidated the regulation of all Irish financial institutions, including insurance entities, in the single body of the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority (IFSRA, now called the Financial Regulator), which is in charge of prudential supervision as well as consumer protection. The prudential framework, per the 2006 Update, is sound and in line with the relevant EU directives and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs). A 2007 report by the Financial Regulator notes that Ireland has made further progress. It has embarked on a risk-based supervisory system, implemented a Consumer Protection Code, brought reinsurance under formal regulation, and is preparing for Solvency II implementation. However, given the fact that ISPs were superseded in 2003 by the more demanding ICPs, as well as the importance of changes expected to take place in Ireland's insurance supervisory framework, the IMF recommends carrying out a formal reassessment of Ireland's compliance with the international standards. Further, in June 2009, the government of Ireland unveiled plans to scrap the Financial Regulator and transfer its supervisory functions to the Central Bank of Ireland in response to the domestic banking crisis, which has exposed serious supervisory weaknesses and corporate governance gaps.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 10.98/12, Ireland is at standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Ireland has a market-based economy. Total government expenditure, including consumption and transfer payments, are moderate. Government spending equaled 34.2 percent of GDP. Ireland welcomes foreign investment and provides equal incentives to both foreign and domestic investors. However, foreign investors are restricted from investing in Irish airlines and agricultural land. Property rights are protected. Corruption is of no concern for investors, as reflected in Ireland's ranking of 16th out of 180 countries in Transparency International's 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Ireland is ranked in the 1st quintile in all global indices benchmarking political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below, and is a world leader in all of the 10 economic freedoms measured by the Heritage Foundation Index. Furthermore, Ireland scores among the top ten countries in terms of capital access, due to the very high level of involvement of deposit-taking institutions in financing businesses. Certain inadequacies in infrastructure remain the most problematic factor for doing business, as highlighted by the Global Competitiveness Index. Meanwhile, a highly educated population, relatively long life expectancy, and high GDP per capita place Ireland among the top 10 countries in the UNDP’s Human Development Index.

Credit Ratings

AA-/Stable Fitch

Aa2/Stable Moody's

AA/Negative Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 217.8 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 49096 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): -2.5% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): -0.3% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 6.1% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): -20.0 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 13.50 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): N/A million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): 1,192 million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton