Logo Countrypages2

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: March 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Open-uri20091008-26004-1yh6rvk-0

Iran

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 9.17 out of 100 90
Business Indicator Index 2.33 out of 12 93

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Iran achieves very low overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 9.17 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. Iran's compliance in the area of macroeconomic policy and data transparency is very poor. Iran has declared a commitment to subscribing to the International Monetary Fund's Special Data Dissemination Standard, although specific subscription dates are not available. Compliance in the areas of institutional and market infrastructure, and financial regulation and supervision is also very low. However, Iran has constantly been realigning its accounting and auditing standards to suit the continuously revised international standards. Beyond this, there is a significant lack of information on Iran's regulatory practices, and in most areas it requires serious reforms to come close to international best practices.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

IDSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

As of February 2009, Iran has not yet qualified for subscription to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS), nor does it participate in the General Data Dissemination System (GDDS). However, the IMF's 2008 Article IV Consultation report noted that Iran has been working with the Fund since 2002 to meet SDDS specifications, with the goal of eventually becoming an SDDS subscriber. Although the report found Iran's statistical data to be generally adequate for surveillance purposes, weaknesses in coverage and timeliness remain, as well as in broad public availability to statistical information. Areas in need of improvement also include accounting practices, which need upgrading, and the provision of advance release calendars.

Read More

IICode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

There is not enough publicly available information to permit an assessment of Iran's compliance with the IMF's Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy. However, successive Article IV Consultations reports by the IMF have stressed the importance of greater independence for the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) in order to enhance both the transparency of its monetary policy activities and its overall credibility. Up to and including the most recent such report, recommendations have been made that Iran's monetary policy be less subordinated to fiscal policy, and it has been repeatedly stressed that greater data reliability can be achieved by harmonizing sectorization, categorization, and residency criteria with internationally accepted standards and principles. The 2008 Article IV report noted that further erosion of CBI independence occurred in 2007, when Iranian President Ahmadinejad dissolved the Money and Credit Council, the monetary policy-making body of the CBI.

Read More

NCCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

According to a variety of IMF reports, from the 2002 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes through the annual IMF Article IV Consultations reports, including the one for 2008, Iran's budget system is suffering from a number of deficiencies, such as complexity, insufficient clarity of roles and political motivated disbursal of revenues from the Oil Stabilization Fund. The government's dependence upon oil revenues has long presented obstacles to achieving its transparency goals, as have non-energy subsidies such as those provided to the country's large charitable foundations. However, most IMF reports note that Iran has taken steps to improve its fiscal policy transparency. Reforms to the tax administration and the introduction of principles embodied in the IMF's General Financial Statistics Manual of 2001 (GSFM 2001) in some areas of fiscal reporting have improved Iran's overall fiscal transparency. However, the IMF has recommended that further reforms, and the broader extension of those GFSM 2001 principles throughout the government, state-owned enterprises, and the public sector as a whole would be helpful. The 2008 IMF Article IV Consultations report discloses that additional reforms, including the streamlining of budget management and the possible replacement of the current 5-year fiscal planning framework with a rolling medium-term framework are in the works. To further enhance transparency, the 2008 report suggested that the Oil Stabilization Fund begin publishing its annual reports online in summary form. Iran is not yet a subscriber to the IMF's SDDS, nor does it participate in the less rigorous General Data Dissemination System, but it has expressed its intent to subscribe to the SDDS in the future and has been working with IMF technical missions to achieve that goal.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

IIEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

In 2003, a press release from the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) listed Iran as a participant in the UNCITRAL Working Group drafting provisions for the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law. However, Iran is not listed on the UNCITRAL website as having enacted legislation based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on Insolvency. There is no other publicly available information that directly addresses Iran's insolvency regime or its compliance with the World Bank's Principles and Guidelines for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems. The International Bank for Development and Reconstruction (IBRD), in conjunction with the World Bank, produces an annual report and a summary "Doing Business" guide, both available on the World Bank website, in which 181 countries are evaluated, inter alia, on aspects of their procedures for business closings. Three indicators are used to compare country performance: the average time to bring a business closing to completion (in years), the average cost (as a percentage of the estate), and the average recovery rate, provided in terms of cents on the dollar. For this category, the World Bank ranks Iran as 107th. On all three aspects of closing a business as tracked by the IBRD and the World Bank (time required, cost, and recovery rate), Iran's performance significantly lags behind the performance of member states of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, but outperforms the regional averages for cost, while lagging behind the region for the factors of time required and recovery rate.

Read More

IDInternational Financial Reporting Standards

As stated on the website of the Islamic Republic of Iran Audit Organization (IRIAO), the IRIAO sets the National Accounting Standards (NASs) in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), formerly known as International Accounting Standards or IASs, issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). IFRSs are being constantly revised to keep up with changes in global financial practices and trends. Consequently, to maintain the level of compliance, the IRIAO has also been introducing new projects for incorporating IFRSs revisions into NASs. According to the IRIAO website, as of February 2009, amendments of NASs aimed at harmonization with international standards were in process. On its website, in a chart comparing NASs and IFRSs, the IRIAO accounted for 9 NASs which made "minor departures" from the revised IASs, and 10 IFRSs that had not been adopted as of February 2009.

Read More

IIPrinciples of Corporate Governance

A 2000 publication on doing business in Iran reported that Iran's business and investment environment is governed by unclear and unpredictable laws. According to a 2005 IMF Article IV Consultation report with Iran, investor protection is weak, as measured by an index including different aspects of corporate governance. However, according to the Tehran Stock exchange website, the 2006 Securities Act is intended to protect investors against unfair practices and fraud, and ensure the adequate and timely disclosure to the public of information on companies issuing securities. The 2008 IMF Article IV Consultation report with Iran states that in 2007, new corporate governance regulations for listed companies, as well as regulations on the supervision of investment companies were being drafted. Meanwhile, the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran has issued new guidelines on liquidity management, internal controls, and corporate governance. However, it remains unclear from publicly available sources whether these measures will bring Iran closer to compliance with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's Principles of Corporate Governance.

Read More

IDInternational Standards on Auditing

In consultation with the Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants (IACPA) and other regulatory bodies, the IRIAO issues standards and guidelines on accounting, auditing, code of professional ethics, as well as code of ethics for personnel in accordance with Islamic rule. In a May 2007 self-assessment report prepared for the International Federation of Accountants, the Iranian Institute of Certified Accountants (IICA) noted that the IRIAO had established convergence of national auditing standards with the International Auditing and Assurance Board (IAASB) pronouncements as a formal objective. In 1998, thirty auditing standards based on the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) were adopted with effective date of March 20, 1999. However, since then the IAASB has revised the standards. To keep up with the revisions to ISAs, the IRIAO, according to a 2005 Iran Daily article on accounting standards, prepared seven new standards and was in the process of revising existing standards. As of February 2009, however, there is insufficient publically available information as to whether the revisions to ISAs have been incorporated into the Iranian requirements.

Read More

NCAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

Iran does not have a functioning Anti-Money Laundering (AML) framework in place, according to the IMF's 2006 Article IV Consultation report (published in 2007) and a 2008 report by the U.S. Department of State (DoS). The IMF's Article IV report identified two key flaws: first, the lack of an AML framework; second, major shortcomings in Iran's framework for combating the financing of terrorism (CFT). The IMF also made reference to the inadequacies in a draft law that the authorities were working on at the time of the 2007 report. The report noted that this draft law did not adequately address the Financial Actions Task Force's (FATF) requirements. The IMF's report makes three key recommendations, namely, Iran should properly criminalize money laundering, expand the number of entities covered by the AML framework, and establish a functioning Financial Intelligence Unit. According to a subsequent 2008 IMF Report, Iran enacted the Anti-Money Laundering Law effective January 2008, though the report cautioned that it was merely a summary framework that will require implementing regulation. According to the 2008 report by the U.S. DoS, the U.S. has designated Iran a State Sponsor of Terrorism. The FATF issued a press release in October 2007 stating its concern that the weak AML/CFT regime in Iran poses a significant vulnerability within the international financial system. In accordance with those concerns, the FATF advised its members to take into account, for enhanced due diligence, the risk that deficiencies in Iran's AML/CFT regime pose. The 2008 U.S. DoS report emphasized that "Iran is currently the only country for which the FATF has publicly identified such significant AML/CTF vulnerabilities."

Read More

IICore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

The IMF, in its 2005 Article IV Consultation report on Iran mentions that a real time gross settlement (RTGS) system referred to as the Rial interbank market was expected to become operational in 2006-2007. The CBI states in its Economic Report & Balance Sheet for 2006/07 that the RTGS system was launched in 2006. It is a large-value transfer payment system developed, adopted and overseen by the CBI. The CBI report also mentions two other payment systems, namely, the Retail Funds Transfer System (SAHAB) and the Interbank Information Transfer Network (SHETAB). The CBI, however, does not identify which of these systems are systemically important in Iran. As the CBI report notes, cash is still the predominant payment instrument, however, there has been an expansion in the use of electronic payment instruments in recent years. The report also noted that the Interbank Clearing House, where various checks are collected and settled, has not been automated yet, and the settlement process might take at least 48 hours. The CBI has stressed the need to standardize the payment and settlement systems in Iran and develop value-added services in line with international best practices. Nevertheless, there is insufficient information publicly available on Iran's compliance with the Committee for Payment and Settlements Systems' Core Principles for Systematically Important Payment Systems.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

IICore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

The IMF's 2006 Article IV Consultation report, published in 2007, indicated that Iran had continued with reforms to strengthen banking supervision, and had introduced significant changes in the financial sector through the adoption of a number of IMF's 2000 Financial Sector Assessment Program recommendations. It had, however, achieved limited progress, and substantial work remained to be done. Looking forward, the IMF pointed to the need to revise Iran's legal framework to clearly spell out the provisions for the CBI's autonomy, accountability, and effectiveness in supervisory matters. The IMF recommended that several prudential regulations be refined, that on-site inspection be fully integrated with off-site research, and that enforcement be strengthened. Further, the IMF called for increased independence of the CBI, the country's financial regulator. Consistent with the IMF recommendations, in 2007 and 2008, the Iranian authorities intensified their efforts to bring banking supervision closer to international standards, points out the IMF's 2008 Article IV Consultation report. While the legislative framework for banking supervision has continued to improve, some weaknesses persist in the banking system. It is recommended that the CBI's capacity to enforce prudential regulations be strengthened through the adoption, and effective implementation, of market-oriented commercial banking legislation. Nonetheless, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Iran's compliance with the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision.

Read More

IIObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

Iran is not a member of the International Organization of Securities Commission (IOSCO), and there is no publicly available information as to the country's compliance with the IOSCO Objectives and Principles of Effective Securities Regulation. The Law Governing the Securities Market in the Islamic Republic of Iran was adopted in 2005, establishing the Securities and Exchange Commission as the regulator for the capital markets. The Securities Act improved regulation of the primary market, implemented sanctions for insider trading, and established the Central Securities Depository. The demutualization of the Tehran Stock Exchange was completed in 2006 pursuant to the Law. However, the securities market remains relatively modest, states the International Monetary Fund's 2008 Article IV Consultation with Iran. In 2007, regulations on the supervision of investment companies, as well as new corporate governance regulations for listed companies, were being drafted. In addition, amendments to the regulation on foreign portfolio investment were under consideration.

Read More

IIInsurance Core Principles

Iran is not a member of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS), and there is insufficient publicly available information as to the country's compliance with the Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) issued by the IAIS. At the time of the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) 2004 Selected Issues report, it was highlighted that, in addition to being "very small" and "underdeveloped," the insurance sector remained predominantly state-owned with excessive premiums. The insurance regulatory framework was further described as "outdated." The IMF's 2004 Article IV Consultation added that adequate privatization was not taking place in the insurance and the rest of the financial sector. At the time of these assessments, the authorization and licensing of private insurance companies were expected to enhance the development of the insurance sector. The IMF's subsequent 2005 Article IV Consultation report, published in 2006, welcomed the licensing of private insurance companies. It stressed, however, the importance of strengthening supervision in the insurance sector. The Central Insurance of Iran was established in 1971 as the regulator and supervisor for the insurance industry in Iran.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 2.33/12, Iran is below standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Iran has a market-based statist economy, in which total government expenditures, including consumption and transfer payments, are moderate. After Mahmoud Ahmadinejad became president in 2005, he greatly expanded government spending, which equaled 26 percent of GDP. There are more than 500 state-owned companies and about 1,000 semi-public companies in the country. Iran's economy is largely controlled by the state and marked by a bloated and inefficient state sector, a reliance on the oil sector (which provides over 85% of government revenues), and statist policies that create major distortions throughout. Resulting from these inefficiencies are significant informal market activities and common shortages. Furthermore, the recent drop in oil prices will be the most significant impact of the global financial crisis on Iran. Iran restricts foreign investment in several sectors including banking, telecommunications, transport, oil, and gas. Meanwhile, all investments are subject to a complicated approval process. Investment is permitted for up to 65 percent of State-Owned Enterprises, except in defense and security-related industries. The parliament has the authority to veto projects in which foreigners have a majority share. Iran ranks 141st out of 180 countries in the Transparency International's 2008 Corruption Perception Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Iran is ranked from the 3rd to the 5th quintile in the global indices benchmarking political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below. Iran's very low score in the Bertelsmann Transformation Index highlights the absence of a transition toward a market democracy. Furthermore, there is a lack of strong economic institutions, according to the Heritage Foundation Index, and protectionism and price controls have led to double-digit tariff and inflation rates. The country is also very limited in terms of capital access, due to the lack of foreign capital available to businesses, the weak development of equity markets, and the limited use of alternative sources of capital. Particularly noteworthy is Iran's “Not Free” ranking in the Freedom House Index, due to the lack of political and civil liberties. Also problematic is Iran's very high perceived level of corruption, evidenced by its performance on the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index.

Credit Ratings

Not rated Fitch

Not rated Moody's

Not rated Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 343.0 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 4629 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 2.2% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 10% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 12.5% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 1.5 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 0.40 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 102 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton