Logo Countrypages2

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: January 2010
Jump to Another Country:
Czech_republic

Czech Republic

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 52.50 out of 100 31
Business Indicator Index 10.98 out of 12 12

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

The Czech Republic achieves medium overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 52.50 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. The Czech Republic’s compliance in the area of Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency is high. However, in the areas of Institutional and Market Infrastructure, its performance is mixed, lagging behind in the area of accounting standards because Czech Generally Accepted Accounting Principles differ from the international standards in many respects. Regarding Financial Regulation and Supervision standards, the country fares well in the areas of banking supervision and securities regulation, but there are no independent assessments of its compliance with the revised Insurance Core Principles. Also, in 2006, the Czech National Bank became the unified financial sector supervisor, taking over the supervision of the capital and insurance markets, pension funds, credit unions, and banks. Therefore, its new supervisory regime has not been re-assessed, although in 2007, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development produced a Securities Market Legislation report that looked at the new Czech Republic securities market regulator, revealing that most of the legal requirements for securities regulation are in place.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

CPSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

The Czech Republic has been a subscriber to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) since 1998 and first met SDDS specifications in 1999. According to the SDDS website, the Czech Republic provides summary methodologies for all requisite data sets, and publishes advance release calendars for all data categories. The Czech Republic also meets or exceeds SDDS timeliness, periodicity, and coverage standards for all datasets. With regard to SDDS requirements for integrity and quality of data, the SDDS website indicates that the Czech Republic falls short in certain data categories. The IMF's 2000 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) found some weaknesses in the Czech data dissemination regime, but noted that the authorities were working toward improvements. As of the IMF's 2008 Article IV Consultation report, some of the problems identified in the ROSC had been addressed, in part spurred by the need to fulfill requirements established by Czech membership in the European Union. However, more work still needed to be done, particularly in the areas of methodological standardization.

Read More

CPCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

The most recent comprehensive account of the Czech Republic’s performance against monetary policy transparency standards is a report published by Oxford Analytica (OA) in 2006. It delivers an overall rating of "compliance in progress," unchanged from the previous year. The Czech National Bank (CNB) provides extensive, detailed, high-quality publications and online public access to information, including same-day voting ratios of CNB board meetings. Some suggestions for improvement made by the OA report, such as.broader access to actual board voting records and published exchange rate forecasts, have been implemented. OA praised the cooperative relationship between the CNB and the Ministry of Finance, noting that this should help insulate the two institutions from political influence. The SDDS website of the IMF discloses that the Czech Republic meets or exceeds SDDS requirements regarding the timeliness, coverage, and periodicity of its posted monetary data, offers advance release calendars for all data categories, provides simultaneous release of data, and meets expectations regarding public access to data.

Read More

CPCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

The most recent comprehensive account of the Czech Republic’s performance against fiscal policy transparency standards is a report published by Oxford Analytica in 2006. It delivers an overall rating of "compliance in progress," unchanged from the previous year. Reform efforts, further inspired by the Czech Republic's successful bid to join the European Union, have led to a high degree of transparency in the budget process. Fiscal data submitted to the IMF with regard to the SDDS meets or exceeds specifications. Progress continues in the Czech Republic's transition from a socialist to a capitalist-style economy with a reduction in extrabudgetary funds and ongoing efforts to close the remaining funds in upcoming years. The result should be greater governmental consolidation and greater harmonization of accounting and reporting standards. The International Budget Project scores the Czech budget process as significantly open, with a rating of 66 percent. A sharp economic contraction in 2009 (forecast to be -4.3 percent by the IMF) has led to a fiscal deficit greater than previously anticipated. However, the Fund believes that the Czech Republic is making the reforms necessary to improve the country’s medium-term fiscal outlook.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

ENEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

In 2001, writing for the World Bank in the context of the ROSC, Gordon Johnson identified a number of weaknesses in the Czech insolvency regime, including inadequate resources for the courts, extremely slow proceedings leading to significant backlogs of cases, weak protection for creditor rights, and lack of professional criteria and training or adequate oversight over the administrative process. Other assessments released prior to 2007 reported similar shortcomings in the Czech Republic’s insolvency framework. Czech law had been amended piecemeal over the years since 1999, but with minimal overall success, as evidenced by the findings of these assessments. However, on July 1, 2007, the new Act on Insolvency and its Settlement Methods No. 182 of 2006 (the Insolvency Act) came into force, replacing the Act on Bankruptcy and Composition No. 328 of 1991 as the Czech Republic’s main insolvency law. The new Insolvency Act was found to be a solid overall improvement on the Czech insolvency framework. In contrast to previous evaluations, the 2009 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development’s (EBRD) Insolvency Law Assessment Project deemed the Czech Republic’s legal framework to be “highly compliant” with current international standards. The assessment noted that many improvements have been made, especially in the areas of estate assets, creditor rights, and reorganization. It is worth noting however, that the EBRD assessment is based solely on the content of the insolvency law. It has not evaluated or assessed the effectiveness or practical operation and application of those laws, nor has it evaluated institutional capacity to apply the law.

Read More

NCInternational Financial Reporting Standards

In line with the European Commission (EC) Regulation No. 1606/2002, listed companies in the Czech Republic are required to prepare consolidated accounts in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. The 2008 EC report on the implementation of Regulation No. 1606/2002 states that the Czech Republic exceeded the requirements of the Regulation by mandating application of IFRSs in the annual accounts of listed companies and permitting IFRSs in the consolidated accounts of all other companies. Companies that are not required or choose not to apply the international standards, have to follow the Czech Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) which are primarily contained in the Accounting Act, supplemented by the Ministry of Finance Provisions on Accounting and Czech Accounting Standards for entrepreneurs, banks, insurance, non-profit organizations, and other governmental entities. According to a number of publications on the subject, Czech GAAP differ from the international standards in many respects. The 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers report on the implementation of IFRSs throughout the world states that the national accounting standard-setter has not announced any convergence plans.

Read More

ENPrinciples of Corporate Governance

In its 2003 Corporate Governance Sector Assessment Project the EBRD came to the conclusion that corporate governance legislation in the Czech Republic was in "medium compliance" with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Principles of Corporate Governance. The EBRD assessment pointed out shortcomings in certain areas, including disclosure and transparency, protection of shareholders rights, and implementation and enforcement of corporate governance legislation. In 2002, the World Bank had conducted a similar review and made policy recommendations in three broad areas: legislative reform, institutional strengthening, and voluntary/private initiatives. The Czech Corporate Governance Code of 2004 is modeled on the OECD's principles of Corporate Governance and remains voluntary.

Read More

IDInternational Standards on Auditing

According to the Chamber of Auditors of the Czech Republic’s (CACR) website, the Czech Republic's transition from national auditing standards to International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) started in 2003. National auditing standards were gradually withdrawn and, in 2004, the CACR decided to implement ISAs in the audits of financial statements covering periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005. As explained in the 2006 CACR self-assessment, the Chamber adopts International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s (IAASB) pronouncements, including ISAs, although with adaptations to reflect the local legal environment. Since 2004, the CACR has been publishing a Czech translation of the Handbook of International Auditing, Assurance, and Ethics, and, at the time of the 2006 self-assessment, the latest version of ISAs had been published. However, the IAASB has since revised some standards. In its 2009 action plan, the CACR reiterated its commitment to the on-going convergence process and noted that the 2008 Handbook was expected to be translated into Czech by August 2008. As of December 2009, there is no information as to whether the translation has been completed.

Read More

IDAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

In its 2007 mutual evaluation of the Czech Republic, the Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures (MONEYVAL) notes that the country has made moderate progress since the last evaluation. The 2007 evaluation found that the Czech Republic was fully or largely compliant with 23 of the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) 40 recommendations (R) and 9 special recommendations (SR). The country was not however, fully or largely compliant with all the core recommendations as stipulated by the FATF. The country was deemed only partially compliant with R 1, R 5 and SR II. In 2009, MONEYVAL released a first written progress report based on the findings and recommendations put forward by the 2007 evaluation. According to the progress report, the Czech Republic has passed Act No. 253 of 2008, a new Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) act which implements European Union Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/70/EC, as well as some FATF requirements. The progress report acknowledges that the new act, along with other measures have addressed several existing shortcomings in the AML/CFT framework. However, the report did not assign updated compliance levels based on these new developments. The FATF, in its 2008-2009 Annual Report, names the Czech Republic as one of the jurisdictions that have endorsed the FATF's 40+9 recommendations.

Read More

CPCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

The Czech Express Real-Time Interbank Gross Settlement (CERTIS) is the Czech Republic's only payment system and, therefore, the country's sole systemically important payment system (SIPS). The system processes both retail and large-value transactions, according to a 2001 assessment conducted by the IMF and the World Bank (WB). The IMF/WB report, however, referred to the CERTIS system as the Clearing and Settlement Center of the CNB. The same report indicated that, as of 2001, the Czech Republic observed seven of the nine applicable Core Principles for SIPS as promulgated by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, since Core Principle V is not applicable in the Czech context,. The country 'largely observed' the remaining two principles, with only minor shortcomings. The IMF/WB report also noted that all four principles regarding the central bank responsibilities were largely observed by the CNB. A new generation of CERTIS, which increases capacity and lowers operational costs, was introduced in late 2006, and the country continues to make progress in implementing the Single Euro Payment Area project. A 2007 report by the European Central Bank affirmed the CERTIS system's importance in the Czech Republic and noted that the Payment System Act and the Banks Act are the main laws governing payment systems in the country. Although the CERTIS system is currently the only existing payment system, the Payment System Act allows for the establishment of other payment systems in the country.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

ENCore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

In 2001, the IMF and the World Bank assessed the Czech Republic's compliance with the Basel Core Principles (BCPs) for Effective Banking Supervision and found it to be either compliant or largely compliant with several of the BCPs. However, some BCPs were assigned a materially non-compliant rating. For example, Principle 1.2 and 1.4 relating to the independence and the enforcement powers of the supervisor respectively were found to be materially non-compliant. A 2003 self-assessment by the CNB, the central bank/banking supervisor, against the BCPs revealed improvements in the overall compliance and concluded that the Czech Republic is either compliant or largely compliant with all the BCPs. Moreover, a 2004 IMF Update to the 2001 assessment attested to improvements in the legal and regulatory framework for banking supervision in the Czech Republic, citing further amendments to the Act on Banks, further consolidation of the CNB's supervisory authority with improved inspection and enforcement powers, and new rules on comprehensive risk management structures in banks. In 2006, the CNB became the unified financial sector supervisor, taking over the supervision of the capital markets, insurance and pension funds, and credit unions, as well as banks. Finally, the CNB, as part of its mission, is committed to the implementation of “internationally recognized standards in the field of financial market regulation and supervision.”

Read More

ENObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

In 2001, the IMF conducted a Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) of the Czech Republic. The IMF assessors, however, assessed the then existing securities market regulator, the Czech Securities Commission (CSC), which was replaced by a unified financial sector supervisor, the CNB on April 1, 2006. In its 2001 assessment, the IMF concluded that the CSC, had sufficient powers to effectively regulate the securities market. However, a major issue concerned the CSC's lack of adequate resources and skills to effectively discharge its responsibilities in many areas in which the law appeared sound and in which the regulator had appropriate functions and powers. The IMF has not had a subsequent comprehensive assessment since the new unified financial sector supervisor started working in 2006. However, in 2007, the EBRD produced a Securities Market Legislation report that looked at the new Czech Republic securities market regulator. The questionnaire-based report reveals that the Czech Republic has most of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulations in place.

Read More

IIInsurance Core Principles

According to the FSSA conducted by the IMF and the World Bank in 2001, the Czech Republic did not comply with most of the Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) promulgated by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) in 2000. The key deficiencies identified by the FSSA included corporate governance, licensing, changes in control, use of derivatives, reinsurance, market conduct, and lack of independence and transparency of the regulator. However, in 2003, the IAIS revised its ICPs and the related methodology. In addition, the IMF assessed the then existing insurance regulator, the Office for Supervision of Insurance and Supplementary Pension Insurance (ÚDPP) of the Ministry of Finance, which was replaced by a unified financial sector supervisor, the CNB in April of 2006. Given the revision of the ICPs in 2003 and the establishment of a new regulator, there is insufficient information publicly available as to the compliance of the new supervisory regime with the revised, more stringent ICPs. The CNB, however, states in its mission that it is committed to the implementation of “internationally recognized standards in the field of financial market regulation and supervision.” According to the 2008 Financial Market Supervision Report by the CNB, the new Insurance Act was expected to pass the first reading by the end of 2009.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 10.98/12, the Czech Republic is at standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. The Czech Republic, which has successfully transitioned to a market-based economy, is committed to a free market and maintains a generally open economy with few barriers to trade and investment. As a member of the European Union (EU), the Czech Republic has adopted tariffs and standards which conform to EU requirements. The Czech Republic has one of the most developed and industrialized economies among former communist countries in the region. Czech investment laws are now in harmony with EU legislation, although difficulties have been observed in the enforcement of contractual rights. The government encourages foreign investment and maintains an open investment environment, provides equal legal treatment to foreign and domestic investors, and offers export and tax incentives. Foreign currency accounts are permissible both domestically and abroad, and the government allows total ownership of domestic enterprises and the establishment of joint ventures by foreign investors. Foreigners are not allowed to purchase land, but branches of foreign companies can acquire real estate. Corruption appears to be of no serious concern for investors as reflected in Transparency International’s 2009 Corruption Perceptions Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

The Czech Republic ranks from the 1st to the 3rd quintile for all of in the global indices below, which benchmark its political, economic, business, and human capital climates. The Czech Republic has been at the forefront of countries undergoing post-communist transformation. This is reflected in its near perfect score and number-one rank in the Bertelsmann Transformation Index. The Czech Republic also scores satisfactorily in most indices measuring economic freedom. However, there are still additional steps that could be taken to improve its business climate. For example, it only reaches the 3rd quintile in the World Bank's Doing Business index due to the cumbersome steps involved in registering, operating and closing a business. The perception of corruption, as indicated by Transparency International, is still higher than for many of its peers in the European Union.

Credit Ratings

A+/Stable Fitch

A1/Stable Moody's

A-1/Stable Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 172.3 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 16,684 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 1.3% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 1% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 5.4% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 10.7 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 1.90 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): N/A million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton