Logo Countrypages5

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: June 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Stringio

Bangladesh

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 20.00 out of 100 79
Business Indicator Index 4.15 out of 12 88

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Bangladesh achieves low overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 20 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. Bangladesh’s compliance in all three broad categories is poor. The highest level of compliance reached under any category is “Enacted,” and there are several standards that either lack independent assessments or have earned a “No compliance” rating. However, it has taken several measures toward meeting the basic requirements of international transparency codes. It is in the process of aligning its accounting and auditing practices with international standards. Efforts to improve corporate governance are being made at various levels, but the capital market is still underdeveloped and weaknesses in corporate governance remain. Despite positive developments, weaknesses also persist in the anti-money laundering and terrorist financing regime, though no comprehensive assessment of Bangladesh's compliance with the Financial Action Task Force's 40+9 recommendations is available. There is also no independent assessment available of compliance with the banking supervision standard. However, a recent technical assistance program is aimed at improving the functioning of the country's securities supervisor and will emphasize the need to regulate the markets in line with International Organization of Securities Commission standards and principles.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

NCSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

Bangladesh is not a subscriber to the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS), but has participated in the IMF's less stringent General Data Dissemination System (GDDS) since 2001. According to both the IMF's 2005 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes - Data Dissemination Module (ROSC) and its 2008 Article IV Consultation, Bangladesh's statistical base is generally adequate to conduct effective surveillance. The 2008 Article IV report suggests that further improvements should focus on enacting legislation that better defines the role of the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) and empowers it to fulfill its mission. New legislation should improve interagency cooperation, especially with regard to data generation on government debt financing via the banks. Bangladesh should also institute advance release calendars, disseminating them to all interested parties, and complying with the release dates contained therein. Greater use should also be made of the BBS website as a place where the public can conveniently and simultaneously access statistical data. The 2008 report noted that the Bangladeshi authorities have made progress on some of the recommendations regarding statistical data from the IMF’s 2005 ROSC.

Read More

IICode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

The principle legislation underpinning Bangladeshi monetary policy is the Bangladesh Bank Order of 1972, which created the Bangladesh Bank (BB) and conferred upon it limited monetary and exchange-rate policy-making and implementation authority. The BB's operational authority was further strengthened with a 2003 amendment to that original Order. In its 2007 Article IV Consultation report on Bangladesh, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) noted that reforms aimed at strengthening central bank operations achieved some success, as did efforts to improve the exchange rate system. The BB used IMF technical assistance to attain significant improvements in its foreign exchange market function and raise public confidence in the currency. However, the IMF’s 2008 Article IV Consultation stressed that the BB still needed to take significant action to improve its financial system and better comply with best practice standards. Overall, the publicly available information does not directly address Bangladesh's compliance with the IMF's Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy.

Read More

IDCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

In its 2003 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on fiscal policy, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) found that Bangladesh had achieved some advances in its basic fiscal policy transparency practices. These improvements include bringing accounting and fiscal reporting standards closer to the basic requirements of the IMF's fiscal transparency code. Further improvements were noted in the 2005 ROSC update, which stated that many of the IMF's 2003 recommendations had been implemented, particularly with regard to fiscal reporting. Chief among the initiatives to improve transparency in fiscal affairs are the Financial Management Reform Program, intended to improve the efficiency of Bangladesh's allocation of resources and to establish a medium-term budget framework at four major ministries. Reforms elsewhere had been slower according to the 2005 ROSC update. After the completion of the update, the failure to hold elections scheduled for January 2007 resulted in a delay of further reforms. However, the 2007 IMF Article IV Consultation reported that the transitional government, which was put in place following the missed elections, enjoys widespread approval for its anticorruption campaign. The campaign has resulted in scores of arrests in both the business sector and within government and has enabled the resumption of fiscal reform efforts. The IMF’s 2008 Article IV Consultation echoed this praise for the transitional government, lauding the authorities’ macroeconomic policies and improved fiscal discipline. The International Budget Partnership’s 2008 Open Budget Index for Bangladesh compiled by Dr. Artiur Rahman and M. Abut Eusuf scores the Bangladesh budget process at 42 percent, earning a descriptive evaluation of "some" openness.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

NCEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

The Bangladeshi insolvency regime is governed primarily by the 1997 Bankruptcy Act, supported by provisions of the Companies Act of 1994, the Banking Companies Act of 1991 (as amended), and the Finance Institution Act of 1993. The laws provide the mandate for money loan courts, bankruptcy courts, and dedicated courts that handle the recovery of debts for banks and other financial institutions. However, the U.S. Department of Commerce's 2007 Country Commercial Guide noted that this legislation is largely ineffective in addressing insolvent companies. Banks prefer alternatives to the bankruptcy courts, including demanding blanket guarantees from company directors as a condition for issuing loans. Implementation of creditor rights is weak. According to the World Bank's Global Insolvency Law Database, Bangladesh is a participant in the Forum on Asian Insolvency Reform (FAIR), a pan-Asian organization dedicated to addressing the fundamental weaknesses in insolvency law in the region. In its fifth meeting, in 2006, FAIR participants began discussion of a proposal to create an online regional network designed to facilitate sharing of information regarding insolvency reforms as they occur across the region. The 2009 "Doing Business Guide" produced jointly by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank noted that no reforms dealing with business closing issues were slated to be enacted in 2009.

Read More

IDInternational Financial Reporting Standards

A 2003 World Bank review of the accounting and auditing environment in Bangladesh noted that national practices were not in line with internationally acceptable standards and suffered from "institutional weaknesses in regulation, compliance, and enforcement of standards and rules." The World Bank therefore recommended improving the accounting and auditing framework by adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) without any modifications and setting up an independent oversight body for enforcing international standards. As part of its efforts towards convergence, per Deloitte IAS Plus website, as of 2007 the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh (ICAB) adopted 31 IFRSs as Bangladesh Accounting Standards. These standards, however, are based on an older version of IFRSs. In 2008, according to the ICAB website, Bangladesh adopted an additional four new IFRSs. The national standards are mandatory for all listed companies and recommended for other entities. In a 2009 ICAB Action Plan, the Institute reiterates its commitment to convergence and makes clear that it will be adopting international standards on an ongoing basis. The ICAB Action Plan also adds that it is in the process of reviewing its educational requirements and strategies with regard to IFRS dissemination and training.

Read More

IDPrinciples of Corporate Governance

A 2008 Asian Development Bank (ADB) “Improvement of Capital Market and Insurance Governance Project” program administration memorandum notes that despite recent improvements, Bangladesh’s capital market is still underdeveloped and weaknesses in corporate governance persist. The Bank also points to "inadequate market supervision" as one of the key problems. A 2009 paper by Javed Siddiqui published in the Journal of Business Ethics further explains that the corporate sector in Bangladesh is characterized by high ownership concentration, lack of shareholder involvement and reluctance on the part of the investor to raise capital through the stock market. Efforts to improve corporate governance, however, are being made at various levels. Since 1999, the ADB has been involved in a project (which is scheduled to be completed in 2009) to strengthen the capacity of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Bangladeshi capital market regulator. In 2003, the Bangladesh Enterprise Institute (BEI), a donor-funded private sector think-tank developed a code of corporate governance. Furthermore, the SEC issued an order on corporate governance to be implemented on a comply-or-explain basis by listed companies in 2006. Among other initiatives, the BEI, in partnership with the United States Agency for International Development is currently involved in a project on “Promoting Governance, Accountability, Transparency, & Integrity” to be completed in 2012 and has also been conducting several training programs on corporate governance.

Read More

ENInternational Standards on Auditing

According to a 2009 Institute of Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh (ICAB) Action Plan prepared as a part of the International Federation of Accountants' Member Body Compliance Program, Bangladesh adopted an official position on convergence to International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) back in 1998. In the subsequent years, Bangladesh aligned its agenda with that of the IAASB and based Bangladesh Standards on Auditing (BSAs) on ISAs. However, a 2003 World Bank assessment pointed out that although the BSAs were based on ISAs, the national standards had not been updated in line with the international standards. Furthermore, the World Bank noted that Bangladesh suffered from "institutional weaknesses in regulation, compliance, and enforcement of standards and rules." The assessment therefore recommended improving the accounting and auditing framework by adopting ISAs without any modifications and setting up an independent oversight body to enforce international standards and codes. As part of its efforts towards maintaining international harmonization, the 2009 ICAB Action Plan states that in December 2008, the ICAB converged local standards with the new and updated Handbook of Standards on Auditing, Assurance and Ethics pronouncements Volume 1 issued by the IAASB. Furthermore, in November 2008, the ICAB adopted its own clarity project to redraft national standards in line with the clarified ISAs. The ICAB expects completion of its clarity project by December 2009. The ICAB is also updating its educational courses and training programs to assist with the implementation of the new and revised standards.

Read More

IIAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

A 2009 U.S. Department of State (DoS) report notes that despite positive developments, weaknesses persist in the anti-money laundering and terrorist financing regime in Bangladesh. The World Bank in a 2003 report had pointed out that the major challenges facing anti-money laundering (AML) efforts in Bangladesh include: building capacity for better identification and investigation of money-laundering offenses; establishing a Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU); building expertise of the Anti-Corruption Commission and the Police Department in tracking down money laundering crime chains; and creating awareness in banks and other financial institutions for AML measures. Some of these issues have since been addressed. For instance, in 2008, the government of Bangladesh enacted the Money Laundering Prevention Ordinance (MLPO) and the Anti-Terrorism Ordinance (ATO) in order to further strengthen its legal framework. The new ordinances also facilitate international cooperation in recovering money illegally transferred to foreign countries and mutual legal assistance for criminal investigation, trial proceedings, and extradition matters. Furthermore, the 2009 U.S. DoS report observes that in May 2007, the government of Bangladesh identified the Central Bank’s Anti-Money Laundering Department as the FIU. However, the DoS report points out that the FIU analysts need to enhance their ability to conduct analysis, investigations and gain a deeper understanding of anti-money laundering and anti terrorist financing measures. The U.S. DoS also notes that Bangladesh law enforcement has not made sufficient progress in pursuing money laundering investigations because of the lack of inter-agency cooperation. Rampant corruption and widespread use of hawala for money laundering further exacerbate the situation. The Asia/ Pacific Group on Money Laundering is expected to complete a mutual evaluation of Bangladesh against the Financial Action Task Force's 40+9 recommendations in the near future.

Read More

IDCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

As noted in the Bangladesh Bank’s (BB) 2007-2008 Annual Report, Article 26 of the Bangladesh Bank Order of 1972 empowers the Bank to issue notes and coins, and manage currencies in circulation. Article 7(A) of the same Order grants the BB the authority to regulate payment systems. The Bangladesh Bank serves as the country's central bank, motivated by its interests in a stable currency and financial system and the smooth operation of monetary policies. The 2007-2008 Annual Report acknowledges that the existing payments and settlement systems in Bangladesh do not conform to international practices. However, the same report states that the central bank is committed to modernizing these systems, along with the accompanying legal and regulatory framework. Included in the modernization plans are the implementation of a real-time gross settlement system, the formation of enhanced clearing houses for both checks and electronic payments, the issuance of modern check design standards, and the expansion of the use of contemporary and innovative payment instruments like credit and debit cards, point-of-sale-systems, and high-value interbank payments. The expected completion date of the project is mid-2009, and it promises to make Bangladesh’s payment systems conform to international standards. Moreover, the Bangladesh Bank, commenting on the country's reform process notes that the authorities are moving towards developing a safe and efficient payment system that is compliant with the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems' Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

IICore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

According to the 2008 Article IV Consultation by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the progress made by the Bangladesh government in pushing ahead with key reforms, such as corporatization of the nationalized commercial banks, strengthening the regulatory and prudential framework, and enhancing the Bangladesh Bank's supervisory capacity, is commendable. A 2007 IMF report also commended Bangladesh for implementing many recommendations of the (unpublished) 2002 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), but found that more needed to be done to bring Bangladesh closer to international regulatory standards. It also warned of underlying weaknesses in the banking system due to the undervaluation of capital inadequacy in individual banks. The report therefore called for a stronger monitoring framework and improved enforcement to improve financial sector risk management and promote banking sector soundness, especially in the climate of rapid credit growth. The 2007 IMF report welcomed the proposed amendments to the Banking Companies Act that, when enacted, would enable the Bangladesh Bank to tighten loan classification standards and increase minimum capital requirements for banks. The Bangladesh Bank, according to the 2008 IMF report, is conducting a self-assessment of its implementation of the 2002 FSAP recommendations and has delayed requesting the IMF/World Bank mission for an FSAP update until its completion. The Bangladeshi authorities have requested technical assistance from the IMF in order to improve their stress testing, according to the 2008 report. However, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Bangladesh's overall compliance with the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision.

Read More

IDObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

According to the Asian Development Bank's (ADB) 2005 audit report on the "Capital Market Development Program (CMDP) in Bangladesh," Bangladesh's capital market is weak, and it lacks the foundation of an efficient capital market. In 1997, the ADB approved the CMDP to reform Bangladesh's capital market. The program was designed to increase market capacity and transform the capital market to be fair, transparent, and efficient, in order to attract more investment capital. The ADB evaluated the completed program as partially effective. While there was some progress in strengthening the regulator and improving surveillance, enforcement of regulations remained weak. In 2006, the ADB sanctioned another Technical Assistance loan to Bangladesh for USD 3 million to improve the governance and supervision of the capital markets. The ambitious project that is slated to be completed in 2009 has four components to reform respectively, the capacity, governance, and surveillance mechanisms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the country's securities supervisor; the capacity and governance of the stock exchanges; the licensing and ongoing professional development of market intermediaries; and the accounting, auditing, and corporate governance of the Investment Corporation of Bangladesh and its subsidiaries. The ADB remarks that in designing the project to improve the SEC's training and capacity, it will emphasize the need to regulate the markets in line with International Organization of Securities Commission (IOSCO) standards and principles while taking into account the developing market context.

Read More

NCInsurance Core Principles

The Asian Development Bank (ADB), in several reviews since 1998, found the insurance sector in Bangladesh underdeveloped and poorly regulated. A 2003 report published by the Bangladesh Enterprise Institute also concluded that the insurance industry suffered from undue political interference, fraudulent claims, inadequate risk assessments, and limited and poor quality private sector participation. In the light of the situation, the ADB sanctioned a technical assistance loan to Bangladesh in 2007 to, inter alia, overhaul the insurance legislation, create a new and autonomous regulatory authority in line with international best practices, and improve the governance of the sector as a whole. In the meantime, an independent Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA) has been established as a unified regulator supervising all public and private insurance entities under the Insurance Regulatory Authority Ordinance and the Insurance Ordinance of 2008. The ordinances repealed the 1938 Insurance Act (as amended in 1993) that had governed the insurance sector in Bangladesh. Prior to the creation of the IRA, the Controller of Insurance in the Department of Insurance, housed within the Ministry of Commerce, regulated the insurance sector. The fate of the 2008 ordinances and consequently the IRA, however, is unknown since they were promulgated / created by the caretaker military government that ceded power to a democratically elected government in January 2009. The ordinances need to be approved by the new parliament within 30 days of its first session to remain valid, notes the Daily Star, the largest English daily in Bangladesh, which adds that the ordinances have been drafted in line with international best practices.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 4.15/12, Bangladesh is below standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Bangladesh can be categorized as a market-based, but statist economy with a substantial number of State-Owned Enterprises operating in many sectors. The government is in the process of privatizing many of them, but progress appears slow. Although the Bangladeshi government encourages foreign investment, and offers incentives for industrial investments, many critical sectors remained sheltered from private investment. The Heritage Foundation notes that capital transactions are subject to control or prohibited, but the U.S. Department of Commerce claims that foreign firms do not experience much difficulty in the repatriation of funds. Overall, the business climate suffers from a number of restrictions. These include the requirement for government approval on non-industrial investments, inadequate implementation of laws, labor militancy, an unpredictable legal situation, and poor infrastructure. Property laws are out of date and intellectual property rights enforcement is weak. Political instability may pose a threat to investment. Corruption is rampant and endemic at all levels of government a fact that is reflected in Bangladesh’s ranking of 147th out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Bangladesh is ranked in the 4th or 5th quintile in nearly all the global indices benchmarking political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below, with the exception of the Bertelsmann Transformation Status Index where it is positioned in the 3rd quintile. Although designated an electoral democracy by Freedom House, Bangladesh is characterized by endemic corruption and criminality, weak rule of law, limited bureaucratic transparency, and political polarization, as well as political violence. Bertelsmann has tracked some improvements in political and economic development, such as impressive GDP growth rates, but a survey of the other indices attests to an unstable political environment, an unfriendly business environment, and an uninspiring social environment. Bangladesh is perceived to be one of the more corrupt countries in the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index.

Name Year Rank Score Quintile
Bertelsmann Transformation Status Index 2010 63/128 5.74/10 3
Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index 2010 137/179 51.1% 4
Economic Freedom of the World Index 2009 115/141 5.93/10 5
World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Index 2009 106/133 3.55/7 4
Milken Institute Capital Access Index 2009 84/122 3.53/10 4
World Bank Ease of Doing Business Index 2009 119/183 N/A 4
UNDP Human Development Index 2009 146/177 0.54/1 5
Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2009 139/180 2.4/12 4
Freedom House Index 2009 Partly Free 4/7

Credit Ratings

Not rated Fitch

Not rated Moody's

Not rated Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 86.7 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 526 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 5.4% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 5.3% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 2.5% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 1.1 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 0.10 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 1,502 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton