Logo Countrypages1

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: May 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Open-uri20091008-26004-1cd0dg1-0

Argentina

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 35.00 out of 100 60
Business Indicator Index 6.07 out of 12 77

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Argentina achieves low overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 35 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. There have been serious concerns in the recent past about the independence of the Central Bank of Argentina and doubts about the accuracy of inflation data. Credible implementation of Argentina's comprehensive legal framework for fiscal transparency remains one of the country's top priorities. The low degree of compliance with institutional and market infrastructure standards and financial regulation and supervision principles is due to the scarcity of information with a number of standards. It is also negatively affected by Argentina's low level of compliance with accounting standards, since local accounting standards differ from International Financial Reporting Standards. Although the corporate insolvency regime in Argentina is consistent with the World Bank's Principles, the adoption of a new legal mechanism instituting a consensual, out-of-court, corporate workout framework is recommended. With respect to auditing standards, although a plan to incorporate international auditing standards has been approved, a resolution issued in January 2007 postponed their adoption. In the area of corporate governance, the National Securities Commission mandated listed companies in October 2007 to annually disclose whether they comply with a minimum set of governance standards or to explain the reason for not doing so.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

CPSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

Argentina is a subscriber to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS). The IMF's SDDS website discloses that Argentina meets SDDS specifications for coverage, periodicity, and timeliness of the data and for the dissemination of advance release calendars. The website also indicates that Argentina satisfies the conditions for the access dimension of the SDDS for all data categories, except for the advance dissemination of a release calendar for population data. Several reports have put in doubt the transparency of the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses and its dissemination of Consumer Price Index data.

Read More

ENCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

In 2006, Argentina was last comprehensively assessed on Monetary Policy Transparency by Oxford Analytica (OA). On this occasion, the rating of Argentina's overall compliance with this standard was downgraded from "Compliance in Progress" to "Enacted." In the recent past there have been concerns about the independence of the Central Bank of Argentina (BCRA) and serious doubts about inflation data, which are mainly controlled by the Ministry of Economy and Production by means of imposing price controls. Whereas in 2002 the BCRA aimed for a fully operational inflation-targeting regime, it appears now to have adopted a more flexible regime. The BCRA must prepare an advance annual monetary program that includes inflation forecasts and monetary aggregates targets. The BCRA's monetary policy is based on the control of monetary aggregates through the establishment of quarterly quantitative targets on the aggregate M2 and the private sector M2. According to the BCRA's 1st Quarter Inflation Report for 2009, monetary targets for the aggregate M2 were met for 2008, but the private sector M2 was below the lower limit of the range stipulated by the Monetary Program 2008. The information on monetary policy is considered to be reliable and comprehensive on a wide range of monetary variables. The BCRA's charter clearly establishes the responsibilities and goals for the BCRA.

Read More

ENCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

In the last available comprehensive assessment of the standard, OA rated Fiscal Transparency in Argentina as "Enacted." The assessment reasons that Argentina's legal framework provides clear guidelines for fiscal management and transparency. These guidelines have been enhanced by the enactment of the Fiscal Responsibility Law (LRF) in 2004. Fiscal data disclosure at the national level is adequate, but the disclosure standards at the provincial level vary. The LRF is meant to increase the fiscal efficiency of sub-national governments and limit future spending and debt issuance by the provinces. Enforcement of Argentina's comprehensive legal framework for fiscal transparency remains one of the country's top priorities. Adherence to the LRF could substantially improve fiscal data reliability and the development of homogeneous indicators. However, fiscal transparency has been negatively affected by the weak control over the use of resources of fiduciary funds and the passage of a law that grants discretionary powers to the Executive in the use of a portion of fiscal revenues without congressional approval.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

ENEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

According to the 2002 World Bank assessment of Argentina's insolvency and creditor rights system, the legal framework for enforcement of both secured and unsecured rights and the Argentine corporate insolvency regime are largely consistent with the World Bank's Principles and Guidelines for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights System. Nevertheless, some improvements are needed. Due to the lack of appropriate incentives for debtors and creditors, the legal framework for informal workouts is rarely used. Also, years of economic recession have significantly increased the number of insolvencies, overburdening the insolvency courts in most jurisdictions. As a result, the World Bank has recommended the adoption of a new legal mechanism instituting a consensual, out-of-court, corporate workout framework. This mechanism should incorporate urgently needed reforms to the insolvency system, leaving less-urgent amendments for a later time. In the medium term, Argentina should focus on changes to the legal and institutional framework for creditors' rights and further amendments to the insolvency regime.

Read More

NCInternational Financial Reporting Standards

The Argentine Federation of Professional Councils of Economic Sciences (FACPCE) coordinates the issuance of professional accounting and auditing standards. According to a 2008 Ernst & Young report, in 1998 the FACPCE’s Governing Board developed a plan to adapt Argentine accounting standards to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). On December 8, 2000, the FACPCE’s Governing Board approved Technical Resolutions (TRs) 16 through 19, thus completing the first stage of the harmonization plan. New TRs have been issued since then. However, Ernst & Young note that the TRs differ from IFRSs in several respects. In addition, since 2007 the FACPCE and the Argentine National Securities Commission (CNV) have been actively working on the comprehensive adoption of IFRSs for listed companies and other companies of public interest. Finally, as stated on the Deloitte & Touche IAS Plus website, on March 20, 2009, the FACPCE approved TR 26, which adopted IFRSs as issued by the IASB in effect as of 2009. The Resolution also includes the commitment to incorporate all new IFRSs and modifications to the existing ones as they become available in the future. Companies included in the public listing system (which lists shares and corporate bonds), or companies that requested authorization to be included in this system, (with the exception of banks, financial trusts, insurance companies, and cooperatives) are legally required to apply TR 26 effective for periods beginning on January 1, 2011. Other companies may apply either IFRSs or continue to follow Argentinean Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which, as mentioned above, differ from the international standards. According to a 2009 publication by PricewaterhouseCoopers, other than the CNV, the regulators have not announced any plans to introduce IFRSs.

Read More

ENPrinciples of Corporate Governance

Corporate governance reform started in Argentina in 2001 when Decree No. 677 was passed, which promotes the adoption of good corporate governance practices for publicly-traded companies. Argentina is considered to be relatively developed in corporate governance matters compared to similar countries, according to a paper published by the Center for Financial Stability in 2005. However, only modest progress has been recorded since, and evidence shows that there is still much potential for improving corporate governance practices in Argentina, including not only publicly-traded companies but also privately-held firms and financial institutions. Enforcement mechanisms and regulators’ supervision powers also need to be strengthened. In September 2004, the Argentine Institute for Corporate Governance published a Code of Good Practices for Corporate Governance in conjunction with KPMG and the Institute for Enterprise Development in Argentina. The Code is primarily aimed at listed companies, but can also be applied to privately held and small and medium-sized enterprises. Its recommendations are based on the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) Principles on Corporate Governance and the recommendations of the OECD's 2003 White Paper on Corporate Governance in Latin America. The Code is voluntary in nature and companies who adhere to the principles of the Code must make a public declaration regarding their compliance with it. In October 2007, the National Securities Commission (CNV) issued General Resolution No. 516, mandating listed companies to annually disclose whether they comply with a minimum set of governance standards established by the CNV or to explain the reason for not doing so.

Read More

IDInternational Standards on Auditing

On July 4, 2003 FACPCE issued Technical Resolution No. 284 whereby it approved a project to adopt International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). The adoption was set to take effect as of June 30, 2004. The Resolution stipulated that the FACPCE would retain the right to adopt ISAs either in full or in part, and the text of the approved standard should include: (1) ISAs translated into Spanish, using Argentine vocabulary and expressions on the basis of a translation that the FACPCE will prepare or adopt; (2) differences stemming from the particular conditions in Argentina; (3) a manual on ISAs for small entities, and (4) stipulation of future modifications. However, as explained in a 2008 article in Imagen Professional Magazine by Godoy, subsequent FACPCE resolutions postponed the application of ISAs in the country and, at the time of the writing of the article, the discussions about the introduction of ISAs were focused on what type of entities should be required to have their financial statements audited in accordance with ISAs and whether the implementation should be gradual or wholesale. In a July 2008 response to the Part 3 of the IFAC´s Member Body Compliance Program, the FACPCE explains that the deadlines for the adoption of ISAs were to be determined by the end of 2008. As of May 2009, there was no information publicly available on whether this objective had been achieved.

Read More

IIAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

According to the 2009 U.S. Department of State (DoS) report, the Argentine anti-money laundering (AML) framework, which includes the criminalization of money laundering, the Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF), and administrative penalties, are set up by Law No. 25.246 of 2000. Since 2002, the UIF has set guidelines for reporting requirements and types of activities related to customer due diligence, record keeping, suspicious transactions reporting, and internal control procedures. In 2005, Argentina ratified the United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism. The DoS report notes that since 2006 the government of Argentina has taken several important steps to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. For instance, Law No. 25.246 was amended to address the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) concerns about Argentine money laundering and terrorism-financing legislation. In June 2007, the authorities passed the long-awaited terrorist financing Law No. 26.268, which provides the legal foundation to investigate and prosecute crimes relating to terrorism and terrorist financing. A two year National Agenda regarding AML and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) was approved through Decree No. 1225 of 2007. The Agenda aims to increase the UIF´s performance and to improve the: (1) prevention; (2) early detection; (3) reporting; (4) investigation; and (5) judgment of acts on money laundering and terrorist financing. The National Agenda is composed by twenty main objectives and 44 secondary goals referred to as the AML/CFT fight. In October 2003, the FATF conducted a mutual evaluation of Argentina. Its findings, based on the FATF's old methodology, were published in 2004. Despite the existence of various reports on Argentina's AML/CFT regime, there is little information subsequent to the 2004 FATF's report addressing Argentina's compliance with the FATF's recommendations. According to Clarín 2009, the FAFT will conduct a new mutual evaluation of Argentina at the end of 2009.

Read More

IICore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

According to a report jointly prepared by the Center for Latin American Monetary Studies (CEMLA) and the World Bank in 2000, the BCRA redefined the regulatory and operational framework for payment systems, and took the lead in implementing payments reforms in 1996. Per the 2003 CEMLA/World Bank report, these reforms have included the creation of a real-time gross settlement system, the main system employed for large-value funds transfers; the Electronic Payment Means, operated by the BCRA; the privatization of automated low-value clearinghouses throughout the country; and the development of large value automated clearinghouses owned and operated by the private sector. The Argentine Interbank Commission for Payment Means of the Republic of Argentina (CIMPRA) was created in the mid-1990s to manage the development of the National Payment System plan, coordinate its implementation, and implement future improvements in the payment systems. CIMPRA is the forum in which the various players of the system (BCRA, banks, bank associations, and automated clearinghouses) study, plan and monitor the performance of payment systems. The BCRA is in charge of supervising the payment system. The World Bank 2008 report asserts that, the weak regulatory basis and the absence of a unit specialized in payments policy issues within the BCRA limit the effectiveness of the supervisory authority. According to another report prepared by the World Bank the national payment system is undergoing a reform of the legal and regulatory framework of its large-value funds transfer and of its retail payment systems, among others. This reform was initiated by the need to diminish systemic risk and ameliorate the overall efficiency of the payment system, notes the World Bank in its report on Global Payment Systems. However, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Argentina's compliance with the Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

IICore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

An assessment regarding the transparency aspects of the Basel Core Principles (BCPs) for banking supervision in Argentina was conducted in 1999 by the IMF. The report found at the time of the assessment that Argentina had an effective legal basis for banking regulation and that its supervisory practices appeared to be consistent with the disclosure aspects of the BCPs. The report also found that the relevant laws and regulations in Argentina were effectively implemented. The Argentine banking legal framework separates banking regulation from supervision, the latter being the responsibility of the Superintendency of Financial and Exchange Institutions (SEFyC), a unit within the BCRA. However, the IMF assessment was conducted prior to the 2001-2002 financial crisis in Argentina. Since that time there has been insufficient information publicly available regarding Argentina's compliance with the BCPs. According to a 2004 IMF report, the BCRA is making progress in strengthening banking supervision. Financial reporting obligations by all banks have now been fully reinstated as of prior to the 2001-2002 crisis. In addition, a capital adequacy regime was reintroduced in January 2004 requiring banks to gradually amass adequate capital relative to their exposure to sovereign and interest rate risks. Nevertheless, the IMF contends that close central bank supervision is needed, given continuing weaknesses in banks' balance sheets.

Read More

ENObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

An assessment conducted by the IMF in 1999 pointed out that Argentina's legislation comports with the majority of the Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation promulgated by the International Organization of Securities Commissions. The CNV regulates the securities markets in Argentina. The CNV is an autonomous entity; however, its independence from the Executive is restricted due to its dependence on the national budget for funding, and due to the appointment and removal of its board at the discretion of the President. The CNV regulates stock exchanges, rating agencies, mutual funds, open market operators, financial trusts, and the public offering of securities. Nevertheless, the CNV regulatory and supervisory powers over different market participants are notably asymmetric. In particular, the CNV has limited capacity to sanction stockbrokers when the legal and regulatory framework is violated, and enforcement is mainly under the control of the stock exchange. Apart from the above description, there is little further information publicly available on the actual implementation of this standard by Argentina.

Read More

IIInsurance Core Principles

In 1998, Argentina conducted a self-assessment of its observance with the International Association of Insurance Supervision’s (IAIS) Insurance Supervisory Principles of 1997. The self-assessment is unpublished but available to the public upon request to the Superintendency of Insurance (SSN). The assessment states that a majority of IAIS’s Insurance Supervisory Principles have been satisfied, either by provisions in Argentine law or through resolutions issued, monitored, and enforced by the SSN. However, the Insurance Supervisory Principles of 1997 were superseded by the Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) in 2000, and the latter were further amended in 2003, and there is insufficient publicly available information as to Argentina's compliance with the new, more stringent ICPs.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 6.07/12, Argentina is at standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Argentina is a market-based economy with a steadily growing role of the state. Energy and transport in particular are dominated by the public sector. Unorthodox policies have been employed to contain inflation, such as imposing pressure on the private sector to limit price increases on some consumer goods, export taxes, and export bans. Although registering a foreign business is fairly simple, and most local companies may be wholly owned by foreign investors, foreign investment is prohibited in various sectors. The most significant deterrent is the legal uncertainty concerning creditor, contract, and property rights. The executive branch influences Argentina's judiciary, the courts are notoriously slow, and inefficient, and many foreign investors resort to international arbitration. Capital flows are restricted, and repatriation is subject to some controls. The legal framework to protect intellectual property has improved in recent years although enforcement is uneven. According to the World Bank's worldwide governance indicators, public sector corruption in Argentina is a serious problem. Corruption appears particularly frequent in procurement, tax collection, healthcare, and regulatory systems. The country’s excessive perceived level of corruption as reported by Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index supports these findings.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Argentina is ranked from the 2nd to the 4th quintile in the global indices benchmarking its political, economic, business and human capital climate below. On the one hand this reflects its principal commitment to market democracy. On the other hand, this commitment is subject to a continuous political struggle between populist protectionism and economic and financial liberalization. Combined with the government's inability to cut red tape in its business environment these factors result in a low ranking in the Economic Freedom in the World Index, the Global Competitiveness Index, and the World Bank's Doing Business Index. The high perceived level of corruption, reflected in its low score in Transparency International's Index, is particularly noteworthy.

Credit Ratings

B/Stable Fitch

B3/Stable Moody's

B-/Stable Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 310.3 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 7,732 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 1.5% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 5.6% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 7.9% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 8.9 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 1.35 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 82 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton